SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(All) 2195

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD 
Rajiv Gupta, Samit Gopal, JJ.
Naushad – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. – Respondent
Criminal Appeal No. - 1557 of 2020, Criminal Appeal No. - 1558 of 2020
Decided On : 30-05-2025

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Kripa Shankar Mishra
For the Respondent: G.A., A.N. Mulla, Shashi Shekhar Tiwari, Arun Kumar Pandey

Circumstantial evidence must be conclusive and all links in the chain must be established beyond reasonable doubt; failure to do so warrants acquittal.

Headnote:(A) Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 364, 302, 201 - Criminal procedure - The appellants were convicted and sentenced to life imprisonment for kidnapping and murder based on circumstantial evidence, including witness testimonies and a recovery memo. The court found significant irregularities in the investigation, particularly regarding the admissibility of CCTV footage and the lack of corroborative evidence. (Paras 1, 18, 39, 72)

(B) Circumstantial Evidence - The court emphasized that all links in the chain of circumstances must be established beyond reasonable doubt, and any reasonable doubt must lead to acquittal. (Paras 45, 70)

Facts of the case:
The appellants were accused of kidnapping and murdering a 5-year-old boy, Zaid, based on a missing report and subsequent witness statements. The prosecution relied on circumstantial evidence, including CCTV footage and recovery of the body, but faced challenges in proving its case beyond reasonable doubt.

Findings of Court:
The court determined that the prosecution failed to establish a reliable chain of evidence, particularly regarding the recovery of the body and the admissibility of electronic evidence, leading to a conclusion that the appellants could not be convicted.

Issues: The main issues included the reliability of circumstantial evidence, the admissibility of CCTV footage, and whether the prosecution met its burden of proof.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the prosecution did not prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, emphasizing that circumstantial evidence must be conclusive and that the investigation was flawed.

Result: The appeals were allowed, and the conviction and sentence of the appellants were set aside.

Table of Content
1. factual background of the case and evidence collection. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10)
2. details of the trial and witness testimonies. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17)
3. court's observations on the credibility of witnesses. (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27)
4. discussion on the investigation and procedural irregularities. (Para 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35)
5. arguments presented by both parties regarding the evidence. (Para 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42)
6. ratio decidendi regarding admissibility of evidence and burden of proof. (Para 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 , 66 , 67)
7. final judgment and orders issued by the court. (Para 73 , 74 , 75 , 76 , 77 , 78 , 79)

JUDGMENT :

Samit Gopal, J.

1. These two appeals are connected together as they are of co-accused and arise out of the same judgement and order of conviction.

2. The present appeals have been filed by the appellants Naushad and Ahsan against the judgement and order dated 17.03.2020 passed by Addl. Sessions Judge/F.T.C Court No.1, Saharanpur in S.T. No.634 of 2017 (State of U.P. Vs. Ahsan and another) whereby the accused- appellants have been convicted and sentenced under Section 364 IPC to life imprisonment, a fine of Rs.25,000/- and in default of payment of fine to 6 months additional imprisonment each, under Section 302/34 IPC to life imprisonment and a fine of Rs.25,000/- and in default of payment of fine to 6 months additional imprisonment each and under Section 201 IPC to 5 years R.I. and a fine of Rs.5,000/- and in default of payment of fine to 1 month additional imprisonment each. The sentences have been ordered to run concurrently. The trial court has ordered that set off be granted to the accused-appellants for the period already undergone in jail by them.

3. A typed application dated 10.8.2017 was given by Nadeem addressed to the Inspector Police Station Kotwali Devband, district Saharanpur alleging therein that his son Mohd. Zaid aged about 5 years and describing his physique wearing white kurta and pajama and yellow coloured sleeper, had gone missing on 10.8.2017 at about 11.15 a.m. without telling anyone. He was searched by him a lot but could not be traced. He had to come to him after being troubled and being sad. He prays that his missing report regarding his son be registered. The said application is Exb. Ka-1 to the records.

4. On the basis of said application, a FIR as Case Crime No.0777 of 2017 under Section 364 IPC, Police Station Devband, district Saharanpur was lodged on 10.8.2017 at 11.15 hours against unknown persons. The Chik FIR is Exb. Ka-5 to the records.

5. Subsequently a handwritten application dated 10.8.2017 was given by Nadeem to the Inspector Kotwali Devband, district Saharanpur alleging therein that on 10.8.2017 he had got a missing report registered regarding his son Zaid and now he has come to know that his son was taken by Ahsan, S/o Majid and Naushad, S/o Zulfqar who were working with him who have kidnapped him. Gulsher, S/o Shamim and Sharique, S/o Mohd. Khalid have seen them taking away his son Zaid. A C.C.T.V camera installed in the house of Dr. Saeed Anwar has also recorded them taking away his son. The footage of the camera be taken and legal action be taken against Ahsan and Naushad. The said application is marked as Exb. Ka-2 to the records. The said application Exb. Ka-2 to the records was registered in G.D. No.43 at 21.15 hours on 10.8.2017 at Police Station Kotwali Devband, District Saharanpur.

6. The accused Naushad and Ahsan are alleged to have been arrested in the night of 10/11.8.2017 and it is alleged that on their pointing out on 11.8.2017 at 4.30 a.m. in the presence of witnesses Waseem and Mohd. Aslam from the sugarcane field of Yaqoob, S/o Sharique by going 15 steps inside, the dead-body of Zaid was recovered. A recovery memo dated 11.8.2017 to the said effect was prep

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top