IN THE HIGH COURT OF
Subhash Vidyarthi J.
Praveen Pratap Singh And Another – Appellant
Vs.
Central Bureau Of Investigation Acu-I
CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 478 of 2025, CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 479 of 2025
Decided On :
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. corruption and conspiracy in public contracts. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 2. similar charges in separate revisions. (Para 14 , 15) |
| 3. validity of agreements and subletting contracts. (Para 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 4. nature of contractual obligations and subletting. (Para 22 , 24 , 27) |
| 5. definition and implications of cheating under ipc. (Para 30 , 32 , 39) |
| 6. final dismissal of revisions. (Para 41) |
JUDGMENT :
Subhash Vidyarthi J.
1. Heard Shri Purnendu Chakravarty, the learned counsel for the revisionists and Shri Anurag Kumar Singh, the learned counsel for the opposite party- Central Bureau of Investigation, New Delhi.
2. Learned counsel for the respondent has filed counter affidavits and the revisionists have filed rejoinder affidavits in both the cases, which are taken on record.
3. Criminal Revision no. 478 of 2025 has been filed under Section 397/401 Cr.P.C., challenging the validity of an order dated 04.04.2025 passed by the Special Judge, Prevention of Corruption Act, CBI, Court No.4, Lucknow in Criminal Case No.1600002/2014 arising out of RC-AC1-2007A0002 under Section 120 -B IPC read with Section 420 IPC and 13(2) , 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Police Station- CBI/ACB, Lucknow, whereby the trial Court has rejected the petitioners’ application for their discharge.
4. Criminal Revision no. 479 of 2025 has been filed under Section 397/401 Cr.P.C., challenging the validity of an order dated 05.04.2025 passed by the Special Judge, Prevention of Corruption Act, CBI, Court No.4, Lucknow in Criminal Case No.1600003/2014 arising out of RC-AC1-2008A0003 under Section 120 -B IPC read with Section 420 IPC and 13(2) , 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Police Station- CBI/ACB, Lucknow, whereby the trial Court has rejected the petitioners’ application for their discharge.
5. Briefly stated, facts of the giving rise to Criminal Revision No. 478 of 2025 are that CBI had lodged the aforesaid FIR on 23.02.2007 against (i) unknown officials of NPCC Ltd. (National Project Construction Company Limited) Delhi and Faridabad, (ii) M/s UCC, 29, Pitambar Nagar, Unnao, U.P. and (iii) others unknown, stating that a source information had been received about corruption in construction of Adwa-Meja link Channel, Bansagar Canal Project in Unnao Region, U.P. which revealed that National Projects Construction Company Limited (which will hereinafter be referred to as ‘NPCC’) is a public sector Company under the administrative control of Ministry of Water Resources, Government of India. It is primarily responsible to carry out construction of civil works and canal systems etc. On 27.05.2005, the Irrigation Department of Government of U.P. had awarded a contract to NPCC for construction of the aforesaid canal at a cost of Rs.14,60,62,604/-. Certain officials of NPCC entered into a criminal conspiracy with a private construction company namely, M/s Unnao Construction Company, Unnao, U.P. (which will hereinafter be referred to as ‘UCC’) and they sublet the contract to UCC for Rs.13.82 crores. UCC further sublet the contract to another private Company namely, M/s Sat Sai Earth Works, New Delhi for Rs.7.16 crores i.e. almost half the amount of contract value of NPCC and thereby caused huge wrongful gain to M/s UCC and corresponding loss to the Public Exchequer.
6. The FIR further states that the Unit Officer, NPCC, Kanpur conducted a site inspection on 23.04.2005 and submitted the rates for excavation work ranging from Rs.300/- to Rs.340/- per cubic meter for preparation of a bid to be submitted by NPCC to the Irrigation Department of Government of U.P. NPCC invited limited tenders on 21.04.2005 from eight firms, including UCC, for pre-tender tie-up for the said work. Out of the eight firms, only UCC submitted its tender on 27.04.2025 quoting rates ranging from 97.5 per cubic meter to 266 per cubic meter for excavation work.
7. A note recommending a profit margin of 5.3% against the total cost of the work, as quoted by UCC, was
The court upheld charges of conspiracy and cheating against public officials for causing financial loss to the Government through corrupt practices in contract awarding, emphasizing that sufficient e....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that conspiracy can be proven by circumstantial evidence, and the material on record must be evaluated to determine the existence of the ingredient....
In tender-related fraud cases, a conspiracy can be inferred from circumstantial evidence, allowing for charge framing even without direct evidence.
The court emphasized that defendants, as private vendors, posed no criminal liability under public servant provisions unless concrete evidence proves involvement in a conspiracy or corrupt practices.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that acts not in discharge of official duties are not protected under Section 197 of Cr.P.C., and technicalities should not impede the dispensation....
The court emphasized that the writ petition and any arbitration award will not be considered as evidence in the trial, and directed the trial court to expedite the trial.
The prosecution must establish beyond a reasonable doubt the elements of cheating and conspiracy, including dishonest intent and the specific role of accused in the alleged fraud.
Procedural violations in public procurement can constitute criminal misconduct under the Prevention of Corruption Act, highlighting the need for transparency and adherence to regulations in awarding ....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the violation of financial rules, sham tender process, and evidence of conspiracy to favor a specific contractor constituted a prima facie cas....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.