IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD, LUCKNOW BENCH, LUCKNOW
Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J.
Vipin Tiwari – Appellant
Versus
State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Hon’ble Subhash Vidyarthi J.
1. Heard Shri Ajai Kumar Shukla, the learned counsel for the applicant, Shri Anurag Verma, the learned A.G.A.-I for the State, Shri Bhuwan Raj, the learned counsel for the informant and perused the records.
2. The instant application has been filed seeking release of the applicant on bail in Case Crime No.317 of 2024 under Sections 109(1), 324(4), 351(3), 103(1), 61(2) of Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita (which will hereinafter be referred to as ‘the B.N.S.’) registered at Police Station-Lalganj, District- Pratapgarh.
3. The learned Counsel for the applicant submitted that a co-accused person Sachin Mishra @ Adarsh Mishra has been granted bail by means of an order dated 09.04.2025 passed by this Court in Crl. Misc. Bail Application No.2963 of 2025 and, therefore, the applicant is also entitled to be released on bail on the ground of parity.
4. Sri. Bhuwan Raj, the learned Counsel for the informant has raised a preliminary objection against maintainability of the bail application on the ground that copies of some extracts of the case diary have been annexed with the bail application although the investigation is yet not completed and the prosecution papers h
Balakram v. State of Uttarakhand
P. Chidambaram v. Directorate of Enforcement
State of Karnataka v. Shivanna
The court ruled that accused individuals must be provided access to prosecution materials to ensure a fair trial, prioritizing their rights under Section 230 BNSS over conflicting provisions.
Procedural lapses in communicating grounds of arrest do not automatically render custody illegal unless they cause demonstrable prejudice, emphasizing compliance with Articles 21 and 22(1) of the Con....
The non-filing of FSL report with the challan does not vitiate the challan or entitle the applicant to default bail under section 167(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code.
The court emphasized the necessity of adhering to Section 309 Cr.P.C. for timely witness examination to prevent undue influence and ensure justice in criminal trials.
Failure to serve grounds of arrest immediately renders the arrest illegal, entitling the accused to bail, emphasizing the importance of personal liberty and compliance with constitutional rights.
A fair investigation is crucial; discrepancies in witness testimonies and procedural lapses can lead to acquittal if the prosecution fails to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.
In terms with Section 173 (2) of the Code, the Officer-in-Charge of the Police Station shall forward to a Magistrate empowered to take cognizance of an offence on a police report in the form prescrib....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.