IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD AT LUCKNOW BENCH
Pankaj Bhatia, J.
Kusum - Appellant
Versus
Anand Kumar and Others - Respondents
Matters Under Article 227 No. 2997 of 2022
Decided On : 30-04-2025
(A) Insurance Act, 1938 - Section 39(7) - Hindu Succession Act, 1956 - Nomination and succession rights - The petitioner claimed entitlement to life insurance proceeds as a nominee, while respondents sought succession rights post the death of the insured. The court held that the nominee's rights do not override the legal heirs' rights under the Hindu Succession Act, emphasizing the need for harmonious interpretation of both statutes. (Paras 3, 5, 35)
(B) Legal principles - Beneficial nominee vs. collector nominee - The amendment to Section 39(7) distinguishes between a beneficial nominee, who is entitled to the proceeds, and a collector nominee, who merely collects on behalf of legal heirs. The court reaffirmed that the nominee does not acquire ownership of the policy proceeds, which remain part of the deceased's estate. (Paras 7, 12, 35)
(C) Issues - The main issues addressed were the interpretation of Section 39(7) of the Insurance Act in light of the Hindu Succession Act and the rights of the nominee versus the legal heirs. (Paras 4, 35)
Findings of Court:
The court found that the rights of the nominee under the Insurance Act do not negate the rights of the legal heirs under the Hindu Succession Act, and thus the petition was dismissed. (Paras 36, 37)
Result: Petition dismissed.
JUDGMENT :
Pankaj Bhatia, J.
1. Present petition has been filed challenging the order dated 12.07.2022 passed by District Judge, Unnao in Civil Revision No. 16 of 2022 (Smt. Kusum vs. Anand Kumar & Ors.).
2. The facts, in brief, are that the petitioner claims that she had taken out 15 life insurance in the name of her daughter namely Ranjeeta when she was unmarried and subsequently, the daughter was married to respondent no.1, and respondent no.2 – the granddaughter of the petitioner – was born out of the wedlock in between the daughter of the petitioner and respondent no.1. Unfortunately, daughter of the petitioner died on 01.09.2021 when respondent no.2 was about 11 months’ old. It is claimed that in the 15 life insurance policies, the petitioner was the nominee as named by her daughter before her death. However, to resist the said claim, respondent no.1 and respondent no.2 filed Civil Misc. Case No.08/2022 under Section 372 of Indian Succession Act before the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Unnao claiming succession including the claim arising out of life insurance policies. It is claimed that the petitioner was not even made a party. Subsequently, the said case was disposed off in the Lok Adalat on 12.03.2022 without hearing the petitioner. Aggrieved against the said judgment, the petitioner preferred an petition being Matters Related Under Article 227 No.2114 of 2022 in which an order came to be passed on 07.06.2022 holding that a revision would lie against the said order passed by the Civil Judge before the competent Court. In terms of the said order, Civil Revision No.16 of 2022 was preferred before the District Judge, Unnao. Ultimately, the revision came to be decided by means of the order impugned vide which the succession certificate was modified to the extent that the amount of all the 15 life insurance policies was directed to be excluded from the list of assets and further directions were issued to the revisionist for depositing the same in the form of Fix Deposit Receipts in the name of respondent no.2 till her attaining the age of 18 years.
3. Neat contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that in terms of the mandate of Section 39(7) read with Section 39(8) of the Insurance Act, it is the petitioner who was named as a nominee, is entitled to the amounts under the policies as being a beneficial nominee. It is not denied that apart from the amounts under the policies, the respondent no.2 would be entitled to succession to her estate as admittedly the daughter of the petitioner died intestate.
4. Thus, the issue that arises for consideration is on the one hand the claim of the petitioner by virtue of her being nominee to be entitled to the beneficial interest arising out of the amounts payable for the insurance policies by virtue of Section 39(7) of the Insurance Act to the exclusion of respondent no.2 vis-a-vis the rights of succession in respect to the amounts under policies of the daughter flowing from the Hindu Succession Act.
5. It is essential to notice that Section 39(7) of Insurance Act was amended in the year 2015 by virtue of Act No.5 of 2015 on the recommendations made by the Law Commission. Section 39 after its amendment is recorded as under:
“39. Nomination by policyholder — (1) The holder of a policy of life insurance on his own life may, when effecting the policy or at any time before the policy matures for payment, nominate the person or persons to whom the money secured by the policy shall be paid in the event of his death:
Provided that, where any nominee is a minor, it shall be lawful for the policyholder to appoint any person in the manner laid down by the insurer, to receive the money secured by the policy in the event of his death during the minority of the nominee.
(2) Any such nomination in order to be effectual shall, unless it is incorporated in the text of the policy itself, be made by an endorsement on the policy communicated to the insurer and registered by him in the records relating
The nominee under the Insurance Act does not have superior rights over legal heirs under the Hindu Succession Act, emphasizing the need for harmonious interpretation of both laws.
(1) Rights of nominee vis-à-vis right of successor – Rights conferred by Hindu Succession Act, 1956 will prevail over rights claimed by nominee under Section 39(7) of Insurance Act, 1938 succession a....
Nominees under Section 39(7) of the Insurance Act have a beneficial interest in insurance proceeds, but this does not override the applicable succession laws if inconsistent. Decisions on such matter....
Nomination in insurance does not confer absolute rights over terminal benefits, which pertain to legal heirs under succession laws.
Rights of the parties to a lis have to be decided in accordance with the statutory provisions and law that prevails on the day the cause of action arises.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that nomination under Section 39 of the Insurance Act, 1938 does not confer any beneficial interest on the nominee, and the amount payable under th....
The ongoing disciplinary proceedings preclude the invocation of the Industrial Disputes Act, requiring resolution through educational legislation mechanisms.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.