Luxman vs State of U.P. - 2025 Supreme(All) 2354

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : G.P. Dixit
For the Respondent: A.G.A.

Table of Content
1. court can proceed in absence of appellant. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. absence of appellant does not necessitate adjournment. (Para 4 , 5)
3. prosecution story details the murder incident. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11)
4. investigating officer's actions documented. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17)
5. charge-sheet filed against accused after investigation. (Para 18 , 19 , 20)
6. charges framed against accused in trial court. (Para 21 , 22 , 23 , 24)
7. witness testimonies support prosecution case. (Para 26 , 27 , 28 , 29)
8. court's review of trial court's judgment. (Para 30 , 31 , 32)
9. evidence corroborates prosecution's claims. (Para 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37)
10. quality of evidence over quantity emphasized. (Para 38 , 39 , 40)
11. legal principles regarding witness testimony. (Para 41 , 42 , 43)
12. motive established but not essential for conviction. (Para 46 , 47 , 48 , 49)
13. final judgment and order of the court. (Para 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54)

JUDGMENT :

1. List revised. No one appears on behalf of the appellant to press the present appeal.

2. Learned counsel for the appellant died long back and as such, appellant was issued notice to engage another counsel vide order dated 24.10.