2025 Supreme(All) 2430
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
SAURABH LAVANIA, J.
Rama Kant - Petitioner
Versus
Deputy Director of Consolidation, Lko. And Another - Respondents
Writ - B No. 338 of 2025
Decided On : 17-04-2025
For the Petitioner: Ravindra Kumar Singh Raj, Amita Shukla, Rajesh Kumar.
For the Respondent: C.S.C.
The court upheld the authority of the Deputy Director of Consolidation to remand cases for further examination to protect state interests, emphasizing the need for thorough evidence evaluation in property disputes.
Headnote:(A) U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953 - Sections 48(1), 132, 3(2), 29-C, and 11 - Petition to quash the remand order of Deputy Director of Consolidation for fresh hearing - The court found that the remand was justified due to issues of evidence and the interest of Gaon Sabha not being adequately protected - The petitioner claimed ancestral rights over land recorded as 'Usar' but failed to substantiate the claim against the state's interest. (Paras 3, 10, 13, and 14)
(B) Jurisdiction - The Deputy Director of Consolidation has the authority to remand cases for further examination of evidence and to ensure the interests of the state and Gaon Sabha are protected. (Paras 10 and 12)
Facts of the case:
The petitioner sought to challenge a remand order regarding property rights claimed by his father since 1955, while the opposing party claimed co-tenancy rights without prior objection until recent years.
Findings of Court:
The court found no valid grounds to interfere with the remand order, emphasizing the need for a thorough examination of the evidence and the protection of state interests.
Issues: The main issues included the validity of the remand order, the nature of the land as 'Usar', and the protection of the interests of the Gaon Sabha.
Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the importance of protecting state interests in land disputes and acknowledged the Deputy Director's authority to ensure proper adjudication of property rights.
Result: Writ petition dismissed.
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. court's observations on procedural and substantive law. (Para 1 , 8) |
| 2. petitioner's claim over property based on historical records. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. statutory provisions regarding land rights and consolidation. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 4. writ petition dismissed based on findings. (Para 14) |
JUDGMENT :
Saurabh Lavania, J.
1. Heard Shri Ravindra Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Hemant Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the State/opposite party No.1 and perused the record.
2. Issuance of notice to opposite party No.2 is hereby dispensed
3. By means of the present petition, petitioner has sought the following main relief:-
"Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of Certiorari quashing the impugned order dated 6.3.2025 passed Deputy by Director Consolidation Lucknow in revision No. 69 of 2025 Ram Bux Vs. Rama Kant under section 48 (1) of U.P.C.H.Act in the interest of justice.Contained as annexure no 1 to this writ petition.
4. By means of this petition, the petitioner has assailed the order dated 06.03.2025, passed in Revision No.69 of 2025 ( Ram Bux Vs. Rama Kant ) under Section 48 (1) of the Act, 1953, whereby the opposite party No.1/Deputy Director of Consolidation, Lucknow (in short 'D.D.C.'), remanded the matter back to the Consolidation Officer, Sarojini Nagar, Lucknow (in short "C.O.") for deciding the case afresh after providing opportunity of hearing to the parties to the litigation to decide the certain issues on merits. The relevant portion of the order impugned dated 06.03.2025, passed by the Deputy Director of Consolidation, Lucknow (in short "D.D.C.") is extracted herein under :-
^^esjs }kjk mHk;i{kksa }kjk IkzLrqr dh x;h cgl dks ns[kk x;k ,oa voj U;k;ky; dh i=koyh esa miyC/k lk{;ksa dk ifj'khyu fd;k x;kA fuxjkuhdrkZ }kjk vk/kkj o"kZ [kkrk l[a;k&67 ds xkVk la[;k 83] 164] 167] 183] 209] 253] 383 esa lg[kkrsnkjh dh ekax dh x;h gSA fuxjkuhdrkZ dk dFku gS fd fookfnr vkjkth iSr`d gS tcfd izfri{kh jkecD'k iq= dq'kky dk dguk gS fd fookfnr vkjkth iSr`d ugha gSA mDr vkjkth iV~Vs ls izkIr gqbZ FkhA ;g iV~Vk mlds firk dks feyk Fkk vkSj firk ds ejus ds ckn jkecD'k iq= dq'kky ds uke ;g vkjkth ntZ gqbZA foi{kh }kjk ewy iV~Vk fnukda 25-01-1955 dk crk;k x;k gS vkSj [krkSuh lu~ 1369&1371 Qlyh rFkk 1382&1384 Qlyh dh udy izLrqr dh x;h gSA foi{kh dk ;g Hkh dguk gS fd izFke pdz pdcUnh esa fookfnr vkjkth dq'kky iq= xksiky ds uke vafdr FkhA ml le; fuxjkuhdrkZ jkecD'k ds firk uUgs thfor Fks muds }kjk dksbZ vkifRr ugha dh x;hA nwljh pdcUnh esa buds }kjk ;g vkifRr izLrqr dh x;h gS tks mRrj izns'k tksr pdcUnh vf/kfu;e 1953 ds /kkjk&11¼,½ ls ckf/kr gS blh fcUnq ij pdcUnh vf/kdkjh ,oa vihyh; U;k;ky; }kjk fuxjkuhdrkZ dh vkifRr vkSj vihy fujLRk dh nh x;h gSA i=koyh esa fuxjkuhdrkZ }kjk tks ikfjokfjd fltjk fn;k x;k gS mlesa xksiky ds yMd+s cnyw] dq'kky vkSj uUgs FksA dq'kky ds yM+ds izfri{kh jekdkUr gSA vkSj uUgs ds yM+ds jkecD'k gSA ikfjokfjd fltjk nksuksa i{kksa dks Lohdkj gSA fcUnq ;gka ij dosy ;g gS fd D;k ftl le; ;g vkjkth dq'kky dks izkIr gqbZ Fkh ml le; dq'kky vkSj uUgs ,d la;qDr ifjokj ds lnL; Fks vkSj D;k dq'kky dh gSfl;r drkZ [kkunku dh Fkh vkSj D;k iV~Vk dq'kky vkSj uUgs ds la;qDr iz;klksa ls izkIr fd;k x;k FkkA ;g fcUnq fopkj.kh; gSA bl lEcU/k esa pdcUnh vf/kdkjh ljkstuhuxj dh ewy i=koyh dk voyksdu fd;k x;kA fnukda 22-09-2014 dks fuxjkuhdrkZ jkecD'k dk c;ku pdcUnh vf/kdkjh dh i=koyh esa gqvk gS vkSj ml le; mUgksaus viuh mez 45 ls 47 o"kZ crk;k gS vkSj blls LIk"V gS fd tc D;k ;g iV~Vk crk;k tk jgk gS ml le; jkecD'k iSnk ugha gq, Fks vkSj izFke pdz pdcUnh esa Hkh jkecD'k iq= uUgs iSnk ugha gq, FksA i=koyh esa jke'kadj iq= gjh izlkn fuoklh [kkuiqj eÅ dk c;ku pdcUnh vf/kdkjh ds ;gka gqvk gSA ;g c;ku 2015 esa jke'kadj }kjk fn;k x;k gSA ml le; mudh mez 64 o"kZ FkhA buds }kjk ;g crk;k x;k gS fd dq'kky vkSj uUgs fookfnr vkjkth ij vk/ks&vk/ks Hkkx ij dkfct gSA nwljs xokg eqUuk flga }kjk Hkh ;gh dFku fd;k x;k gS fd fookfnr vkjkth ij nksuks vk/ks&vk/ks Hkkx gSA i=koyh esa jkeyyh iRuh j.kthr flga iq=