SAURABH LAVANIA
Rama Devi – Appellant
Versus
Deputy Director Of Consolidation, Hardoi – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard Sri Anurag Shukla, Advocate, counsel for petitioner, Sri Anurag Narayan Srivastava, Advocate, counsel for the Respondent No. 5 and Sri Hemant Kumar Pandey, Learned standing counsel.
2. In view of the order proposed to be passed by this Court, notice to other private-respondents is dispensed with.
3. The present petition has been filed for the following main reliefs:-
(ii) to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the Respondents not to interfere in the peaceful possession, use and occupation of purchased share of Khata no. 422"
4. The brief facts of the case, as appears from record, are as under:-
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.