SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(All) 2442

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD, LUCKNOW BENCH
Hon'ble Rajnish Kumar,J.
Prakash Narain – Appellant
Versus
Hari Bux Singh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Ankit Pande
For the Respondent: Onkar Nath Pandey.

JUDGMENT :

Rajnish Kumar, J.

1. The instant appeal under Order XLIII Rule 1(U) of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (herein-after referred as C.P.C.) has been filed against the Judgment and order dated 04.01.2022 passed in Civil Appeal No.110 of 2011; Hari Bux Singh and others vs. Prakash Narain and others by the Additional District and Sessions Judge, Court No.1, Sultanpur, by means of which the appeal has been allowed and the Judgment and decree passed by the trial court has been set aside and the matter has been remanded back to the trial court for fresh decision of the suit on merits.

2. Learned counsel for the plaintiff-appellants submitted that the defendant-respondents were not present when the case was called for hearing on the date fixed, therefore, the appeal could not have been decided on merit by the lower appellate court and it should have been dismissed under Order XLI Rule 17 of C.P.C. He further submitted that the lower appellate court has decided the civil appeal in violation of Order XLI Rule 31 of C.P.C. without framing points for determination and recording the findings thereon.

3. He further submitted that the plea of limitation taken by the defendant-respondents was




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top