SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

SALIL KUMAR RAI
Janki Prasad – Appellant
Versus
Sanjay Kumar – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellant:S. Mohd Kazim, Advocate
For the Respondents:Pratap Krishan, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Salil Kumar Rai, J.—Heard the counsel for the appellant and the counsel for the respondents.

2. The present Second Appeal has been filed against the judgment and decree dated 23.9.2015 passed by the Special Jude (Prevention of Corruption Act), Court No. 2/Additional District Judge, Lucknow (hereinafter in short referred to as ‘lower appellate Court’) dismissing the Regular Civil Appeal No.5000248 of 2013 (Janki Prasad vs. Sanjay Kumar and others) filed by the appellant. The records of the case indicate that the appeal has not yet been admitted for final hearing. By order dated 4.12.2015, the records of the case were summoned and have been received by this Court. In the circumstances, with the consent of the counsel for the parties, the Court proceeded to hear the present Second Appeal on admission and also for final hearing.

3. The facts relevant for the decision of the Second Appeal are that the respondents instituted Original Suit No. 36 of 2010 praying for a decree of permanent prohibitory injunction restraining the appellant from interfering in their peaceful possession over the suit-property. The respondents were the plaintiffs in the Suit and the appellant was the def

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top