SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(All) 2461

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD 
Mahesh Chandra Tripathi, Prashant Kumar, JJ.
Usman Ali - Petitioner
Vs.
State of U.P. and others - Respondent
Criminal Misc. Writ Petition No. - 2611 of 2020 
Decided On : 10-04-2025 


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Md. Aman Khan
For the Respondent: A.S.G.I.,G.A.,Manish Singh,Prahlad Kumar Khare,Sanjay Kumar Yadav,Sikandar Khan,Sushma Singh,Vineet Sankalp

The court emphasized that the transfer of investigation must be justified by exceptional circumstances, ensuring a fair and impartial investigation while upholding the integrity of the judicial process.

Headnote:(A) Constitution of India - Article 226 - Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1932 - Sections 147, 148, 149, 302, 120B IPC - Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 - National Investigation Agency Act, 2008 - Transfer of investigation from local police to CBCID challenged - Court found previous transfer order non-speaking and quashed it, directing a fresh decision on transfer of investigation - The petitioner sought to ensure fair investigation and appropriate charges under relevant acts. (Paras 4, 8, 27, 42)

(B) Investigation - The power of courts to order further investigation or transfer of investigation to a different agency is recognized, particularly where the integrity of the investigation is questioned or high officials are implicated - Courts must exercise this power cautiously and only in exceptional circumstances. (Paras 30, 32, 39)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner, brother of a murder victim, challenged the transfer of investigation of his brother's murder case from local police to CBCID, alleging influence by the accused. The murder was linked to a banned extremist organization. (Paras 1, 3, 10)

Findings of Court:
The court found the transfer order lacking in reasoning and quashed it, allowing the state to reconsider the transfer request. The court emphasized the necessity of a fair and impartial investigation. (Paras 8, 42)

Issues: The main issue was whether the circumstances warranted a transfer of investigation to CBI/NIA, considering the allegations of influence and the nature of the crime. (Paras 27, 28)

Ratio Decidendi: The court highlighted the importance of a fair investigation and the exceptional circumstances under which a transfer of investigation is justified, referencing established legal principles regarding further investigation. (Paras 30, 32)

Result: Writ petition dismissed, allowing the state to reconsider its decision on the transfer of investigation.

Table of Content
1. factual background of the murder case and investigation. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7)
2. petitioner's arguments for transferring investigation to cbi/nia. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16)
3. state's arguments against the transfer of investigation. (Para 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21)
4. court's analysis of the necessity for investigation transfer. (Para 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34)
5. court's final decision to dismiss the writ petition. (Para 42 , 43)

JUDGMENT :

Prashant Kumar, J.

1. Heard Shri Rakesh Pande, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Mohd. Aman Khan, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Paritosh Malviya, learned AGA-I alongwith Shri Sanjay Kumar Singh, learned AGA for the State-respondents.

2. The instant writ petition is preferred under Article 226 of Constitution of India seeking following reliefs:-

“a. To call for the records from the respondents.

b. To issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned order dated 26.06.2019 (Vide Annexure No.1 of this Writ Petition) (Letter No.12 C.I.D./6-Pu-11-19-387M/2018) passed by the Government of U.P. through its Principal Secretary Home, Police Anubhag-11, Home Department U.P. whereby it has transferred the investigation of Case Crime No.238 of 2018 under Sections 147 , 148, 149, 302, 120B, 34 IPC and Section 7 of Criminal Law Amendment Act, Police Station Chopan, District Sonbhadra, U.P. from the local police of Police Station Chopan, District Sonbhadra to C.B.C.I.D. and has not passed any order relating to the prayer of the petitioner for adding the offences under the Unlawful Activity Prevention Act, 1967 and for taking necessary actions under Section 6 of the National Investigation Agency Act, 2008 i.e. submission of report to the Central Govt. as contemplated under Section 6 (2) of the National Investigation Agency Act, 2008 so that Central Govt. may take a decision as contemplated under Section6(3) of the National Investigation Agency Act, 2008.

c. To issue a writ in the nature of mandamus directing/commanding the investigation of C.B. Case No.93 of 2019, Sector Varanasi, which arises out of aforesaid Case Crime No.238 of 2018 under Sections 147 , 148, 149, 302, 120B, 34 IPC and Section 7 of Criminal Law Amendment Act, Police Station Chopan, District Sonbhadra, U.P. to be transferred from C.B.C.I.D. to agency of Central Govt. i.e. the National Investigation Agency or the Central Bureau of Investigation.

d. To issue a writ in the nature of mandamus commanding the Union of India, Ministry of Home Affairs to take a decision on the representation dated 12.07.2019 (vide Annexure No.33) on behalf of the petitioner for taking action under Section 6 (5) of the National Investigation Agency Act, 2008.

e. To ensure fair, impartial, prompt and timely investigation of Case Crime No.238 of 2018 under Sections 147 , 148, 149, 302, 120B, 34 IPC and Section 7 of Criminal Law Amendment Act, Police Station Chopan, District Sonbhadra, U.P. which is presently being investigated by the C.B.C.I.D. Sector Varanasi as C.B. Case No.93 of 2019 Sector Varanasi by monitoring the investigation of the aforesaid Case Crime No.238 of 2018 which is presently being investigated by the C.B.C.I.D. Sector Varanasi as C.B. Case No.93 of 2019 Sector Varanasi and to direct penal and disciplinary action against the investigating officers for lapses and shortcomings in investigation of aforesaid Case Crime No.238 of 2018 presently C.B. Case No.93 of 2019 Sector Varanasi.

f. To ensure that petitioner is not pressurized in pursuing the Sessions Trial No.18/19 of 2019 arising out of Case Crime No.238 of 2018 under Sections 147 , 148, 149, 302, 120B, 34 IPC and Section 7 of Criminal Law Amendment Act, Police Station Chopan, District Sonbhadra, as well as pursuing and participating in the further investigation of the aforesaid Case Crime No.238 of 2018 on account of threat and danger of life and person of the counsel of the petitioner who is repres

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top