Bank Can Adjust OTS Deposit on Borrower Default, No Cheating u/s 420 IPC: Delhi High Court
02 Mar 2026
Divij Kumar Quits CMS INDUSLAW for Independent Practice
03 Mar 2026
Global Lawyers Debate AI Liability in Autonomous Vehicles
03 Mar 2026
CCPA Fines Startup ₹8 Lakh for False Child Growth Claims
05 Mar 2026
Madras High Court Scoffs at Police Custody Injury Claim
05 Mar 2026
India's Criminal Investigations Face Systemic Conviction Crisis
05 Mar 2026
Kerala HC Slams TDB Financial Discipline in Ayyappa Conclave, Orders Auditor Report on Past Anomalies: High Court of Kerala
06 Mar 2026
ST Members Can Invoke Section 13B HMA If Hinduised By Customs: Chhattisgarh High Court
06 Mar 2026
Lease Cancellation Valid Even by 'In-Charge' Mining Officer Under OMMC Rules: Orissa High Court
06 Mar 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
E.S.INDIRESH
Mallappa Boraddi – Appellant
Versus
Director General Of Police – Respondent
ORDER :
E.S. INDIRESH, J.
Heard Sri. Kulkarni Shrinath, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Sri. Mahantesh Shettar, learned Additional Government Advocate appearing for the respondent-State.
2. In this writ petition, the petitioner is assailing the 'B' Report, dated 21.10.2023, in Crime No.12 of 2023 on the file of 41st Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate Court, Bangalore, inter-alia, sought for a direction to the respondents to consider the representation dated 23.03.2023 produced at Annexure-D to the writ petition inter-alia sought for re-investigation by a independent agency in accordance with law.
3. Relevant facts for the adjudication of this writ petition are that, on 23.02.2023, FIR came to be registered by the respondent No.4 in Crime No. 12 of 2023 for the offence punishable under Section 306 of IPC, based on the complaint filed by one Smt. Girijamma Boreddy, wife of the deceased- Shankarappa Boreddy. In the said proceedings, one Nandini, resident of Bangalore has been shown as accused. It is also forthco
The judgment emphasizes the constitutional right to a fair and just investigation, the duty of the police to act according to law, and the need for a balanced approach between individual rights and s....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the court's duty to ensure fair investigation and prosecution, as well as the power of the Constitutional Court to direct re-investigation in excep....
Victim has a fundamental right of fair investigation and fair trial – Mere filing of charge-sheet and framing of charges cannot be an impediment in ordering further investigation/re-investigation/de ....
The necessity for a C.B.I. investigation arises in cases where police personnel are accused, ensuring fairness and public confidence in the judicial process.
The magistrate has no power to order further investigation suo motu or on the request of the complainant/informant after cognizance is taken and the accused person appears, nor does the magistrate ha....
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.