Lalsa Yadav vs Board of Revenue, Lucknow

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2025 Supreme(All) 2523

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
Hon'ble Chandra Kumar Rai,J.
Lalsa Yadav – Appellant
Versus
Board of Revenue, Lucknow – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. R.P. Yadav
For the Respondents: Mr. Tarun Gaur, standing counsel.

Table of Content
1. petitioner's father granted lease (Para 4)
2. petitioner argues for rights (Para 5 , 6 , 8 , 9)
3. court considers arguments (Para 7)
4. commissioner's jurisdiction affirmed (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 15 , 16)
5. writ petition allowed (Para 14)

ORDER :

Order on Civil Misc. Impleadment Application No.8/2024.

2. No ground for impleadment is made out.

Order on Writ Petition.

2. Brief facts of the case are that petitioner’s father- Jangi Yadav was granted lease of plot nos. 228, 117, 119, 120, 121 and 122. On the basis of the lease executed in favour of the petitioner’s father, his name was accordingly recorded in the revenue records in respect to plot no.228 only but the name of the petitioner’s father was not recorded over the remaining plots, accordingly, in the proceeding under Sections 33/39 of the U.P. Land Revenue Act, an order was passed by the revenue authority for recording the name of the petitioner’s father but later on the order was recalled. The village in question was brought under consolidation operation by way of notification issued under Section 4(2) of the U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953 (hereinafter referred to as the “U.P. C.H. Act”) on 27.6.1981.