SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(All) 2584

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
Hon'ble Krishan Pahal,J., Ravi Kumar
Ravi Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Anuj Bajpai
For the Respondent: G.A.

JUDGMENT :

Krishan Pahal, J.

1. List has been revised.

2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as Sri Amit Kumar, learned State Law Officer and perused the material placed on record.

3. Applicant seeks bail in Case Crime No. 613 of 2024, U/S 69, 351(2) B.N.S. , Police Station Tilhar, District Shahjahanpur, during the pendency of trial.

4. As per prosecution story, the applicant is stated to have established corporeal relationship with the victim on the false promise of marriage and had subsequently refused to comply with the said promise.

5. Learned counsel for the applicant has argued that the applicant is absolutely innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case with a view to cause unnecessary harassment and to victimize him. It is stated that he has nothing to do with the said offence. The victim is major, aged about 27 years and the allegations made in the FIR are per se false. Since both of them have fallen apart, as such, the FIR has been lodged.

6. Several other submissions have been made on behalf of the applicant to demonstrate the falsity of the allegations made against him. The circumstances which, as per counsel, led to the false implication of the ap

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top