SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(All) 2584

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD 
Krishan Pahal, J.
        
Ravi Kumar – Appellant 
Versus
State of U.P. – Respondent
CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 46789 of 2024
Decided On : 11-02-2025

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Anuj Bajpai
For the Respondent: G.A.

Bail is a rule and imprisonment an exception; the presumption of innocence prevails until proven guilty.

Headnote:

(A) Bail Application - Sections 69, 351(2) B.N.S. - Article 21 of the Indian Constitution - Applicant seeks bail during trial for establishing corporeal relationship under false promise of marriage - Allegations deemed false; applicant has no criminal history and is not likely to misuse bail - Court emphasizes 'Presumption of Innocence Unless Proven Guilty' and the principle that 'bail is a rule and jail is an exception' (Paras 10, 11, 12).

(B) The court noted that there were no exceptional circumstances to deny bail and that the object of bail is to secure attendance at trial (Paras 14, 15).

(C) The bail application is allowed with conditions to ensure compliance (Para 16).

Facts of the case:
The applicant is accused of establishing a corporeal relationship with the victim on a false promise of marriage, with the victim being a major aged about 27 years. The applicant claims to be falsely implicated.

Findings of Court:
The applicant has made out a case for bail, and the application is allowed.

Issues: The main issues addressed include the applicant's innocence, the nature of the allegations, and the justification for granting bail.

Ratio Decidendi: The court reiterated the principle that bail should not be withheld as punishment and emphasized the necessity of a prima facie case without exhaustive examination of merits (Paras 9, 10, 12).

Result: Bail application allowed.

JUDGMENT :

Krishan Pahal, J.

1. List has been revised.

2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as Sri Amit Kumar, learned State Law Officer and perused the material placed on record.

3. Applicant seeks bail in Case Crime No. 613 of 2024, U/S 69, 351(2) B.N.S. , Police Station Tilhar, District Shahjahanpur, during the pendency of trial.

4. As per prosecution story, the applicant is stated to have established corporeal relationship with the victim on the false promise of marriage and had subsequently refused to comply with the said promise.

5. Learned counsel for the applicant has argued that the applicant is absolutely innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case with a view to cause unnecessary harassment and to victimize him. It is stated that he has nothing to do with the said offence. The victim is major, aged about 27 years and the allegations made in the FIR are per se false. Since both of them have fallen apart, as such, the FIR has been lodged.

6. Several other submissions have been made on behalf of the applicant to demonstrate the falsity of the allegations made against him. The circumstances which, as per counsel, led to the false implication of the applicant have also been touched upon at length. 7. There is no criminal history of the applicant. The applicant is languishing in jail since 8.11.2024. In case, the applicant is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail.

8. Learned State Law Officer has vehemently opposed the bail application but has not disputed the fact that there is no criminal history of the applicant.

9. In light of the judgement of the Supreme Court passed in Niranjan Singh and another vs. Prabhakar Rajaram Kharote and others, AIR 1980 SC 785 this Court has avoided detailed examination of the evidence and elaborate documentation of the merits of the case as no party should have the impression that his case has been prejudiced. A prima facie satisfaction of case is needed but it is not the same as an exhaustive exploration of the merits in the order itself.

10. The well-known principle of "Presumption of Innocence Unless Proven Guilty," gives rise to the concept of bail as a rule and imprisonment as an exception.

11. A person's right to life and liberty, guaranteed by Article 21 of the Indian Constitution , cannot be taken away simply because the person is accused of committing an offence until the guilt is established beyond a reasonable doubt. Article 21 of the Indian Constitution states that no one's life or personal liberty may be taken away unless the procedure established by law is followed, and the procedure must be just and reasonable. The said principle has been recapitulated by the Supreme Court in Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and Ors., 2022 INSC 690 .

12. Reiterating the aforesaid view the Supreme Court in the case of Manish Sisodia Vs. Directorate of Enforcement, 2024 INSC 595 has again emphasized that the very well-settled principle of law that bail is not to be withheld as a punishment is not to be forgotten. It is high time that the Courts should recognize the principle that “bail is a rule and jail is an exception”.

13. Learned State Law Officer could not bring forth any exceptional circumstances which would warrant denial of bail to the applicant.

14. It is settled principle of law that the object of bail is to secure the attendance of the accused at the trial. No material particulars or circumstances suggestive of the applicant fleeing from justice or thwarting the course of justice or creating other troubles in the shape of repeating offences or intimidating witnesses and the like have been shown by learned State Law Officer.

15. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, the evidence on record, and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the Court is of the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail. The bail application is allowed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top