JUDGMENT :

Krishan Pahal, J.

1. List has been revised.

2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as Sri Anit Kumar Shukla, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material placed on record.

3. Applicant seeks bail in Case Crime No. 608 of 2024, U/S 87, 64, 123 B.N.S., Police Station Shikohabad, District Firozabad, during the pendency of trial.

4. As per prosecution story, the applicant is stated to have enticed away the wife of the informant on 2.10.2024.

5. Learned counsel for the applicant has argued that the applicant is absolutely innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case with a view to cause unnecessary harassment and to victimize him. It is stated that he has nothing to do with the said offence. It is stated that FIR is delayed by eight days and there is no explanation of the said delay caused.

6. It is further stated that the victim is major and is a married lady. She is the consenting party, as she has stated in her statement recorded u/s 183 B.N.S.S. that the applicant had spiked her drink and had left her at Subhash crossing. She has further stated that the FIR has been instituted on false facts.

7. Several other submissions have been made on beha