SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(All) 2631

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
Hon'ble Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal,J.
Arpit Kumar Chaubey – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Sanjeev Kumar Singh

JUDGMENT :

Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal, J.

1. Heard Shri Amit Kumar Singh, Advocate holding brief of Shri Sanjeev Kumar Singh, learned counsel for applicants, Sri Raj Bahadur Verma, learned A.G.A for the State and perused the record.

2. The instant application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed for quashing the impugned summoning order dated 20.05.2024 passed by ACJM 1st, Gorakhpur in Complaint Case No. 47116/2023, under Section 138 of N. I. Act, P.S. Chaurichaura, District-Gorakhpur.

3. From perusal of the report of stamp reporter, it appears that present application filed u/s 482 Cr.P.C. was presented before the Registry on 27.01.2025. The Division Bench of this court in Criminal Misc. Writ Petition No. 12287 of 2024 (Deepu & Others Vs. State of U.P. & Others) vide order dated 06.08.2024 has observed that all the applications filed u/s 482 Cr.P.C. after 01.07.2024 are not maintainable as the Cr.P.C. has been repealed and New Act i.e. BNSS has been enforced on 01.07.2024 and the proceedings or orders of District Courts subsequent to 01.07.2024 could be challenged only u/s 528 of BNSS. Paragraph no.16 of Deepu's case (supra) is being quoted as under:

"16. On the basis of above analys

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top