SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(All) 2704

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal
Kanhaiya – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellants : Rizwan Sayed, Ziya Uddin

JUDGMENT :

Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal, J.

1. Heard Sri Rizwan Sayed, learned counsel for the applicants and Sri Ramesh Kumar, learned AGA for the State.

2. The present 482 Cr.P.C. application has been filed to quash the impugned summoning order dated 05.03.2024 passed by Additional Civil Judge (J.D.) Judicial Magistrate, Garhmukteshwar, Hapur as well as entire proceedings of Complaint Case No. 756 of 2022, Smt. Simpal Vs. Kanhaiya and others, under Section-498-A, 323, 504 IPC and Section-3/4 D.P. Act, Police Station-Bahadurgarh, District-Hapur.

3. From perusal of the report of stamp reporter, it appears that present application filed u/s 482 Cr.P.C. was presented before the Registry on 26.11.2024. The Division Bench of this court in Criminal Misc. Writ Petition No. 12287 of 2024 (Deepu & Others Vs. State of U.P. & Others) vide order dated 06.08.2024 has observed that all the applications filed u/s 482 Cr.P.C. after 01.07.2024 are not maintainable as the Cr.P.C. has been repealed and New Act i.e. BNSS has been enforced on 01.07.2024 and the proceedings or orders of District Courts subsequent to 01.07.2024 could be challenged only u/s 528 of BNSS. Paragraph no.16 of Deepu's case (supra) is

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top