SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(All) 2659

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
RAJEEV MISRA, J.
Vikas And 2 Others – Appellant 
Versus
State of U.P. and Another – Respondent 
APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 1391 of 2025 
Decided on : 24-01-2025


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Harikesh,Vimlendu Tripathi
For the Respondent: G.A.

The court emphasized the need for careful scrutiny of FIRs in cases involving serious allegations, allowing for interim relief to protect the liberty of the accused until a thorough examination of the case is conducted.

Headnote:

(A) Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Section 482 - Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 - Quashing of proceedings - Application filed to quash summoning and cognizance orders in a case involving serious allegations of rape and intimidation - The court noted the need for careful scrutiny of FIRs in frivolous cases and emphasized the importance of considering all circumstances beyond mere allegations. (Paras 8, 9, 12)

(B) Interim Relief - The court granted interim relief by staying further proceedings against the applicants until the next hearing, highlighting the necessity of protecting the liberty of the accused in light of similar cases. (Paras 12, 13)

Facts of the case:
The applicants, charge sheeted in a case involving serious allegations, sought to quash the proceedings initiated against them, claiming the FIR was based on false allegations with ulterior motives. The incident allegedly occurred on 19.06.2023, with the FIR lodged on 30.12.2023, raising questions about the delay and credibility of the complaint.

Findings of Court:
The court found that the matter required consideration and stayed further proceedings against the applicants, indicating the need for a thorough examination of the case's merits.

Issues: The main issues included the validity of the FIR, the delay in lodging it, and the credibility of the allegations made against the applicants.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that it is essential to look beyond the FIR in cases of frivolous allegations, considering all attending circumstances to ascertain the necessity of the alleged offence. The court also noted the importance of interim protection for the accused in similar cases.

Result: Further proceedings stayed.

Hon'ble Rajeev Misra,J.

Heard Mr. Vimlendu Tripathi, the learned counsel for applicants, the learned A.G.A. for State and Mr. J.K. Upadhyay, assisted by Mr. Pankaj Upadhyay, the learned counsel representing opposite party-1.

Perused the record.

This application under section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by charge sheeted accused Vikas and 2 Others with the following prayer:

"It is, therefore, most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to:

Final Relief:

To quash the impugned summoning and cognizance order dated 27.02.2024 and 11.03.2024 passed by the court of Special Judge (SC/ST Act), Gautam Buddh Nagar in Special Trial No. 200 of 2024 (State of U.P. vs. Vikas and others) as well as the impugned ist charge sheet and 2nd charge sheet dated 24.02.2024 and 10.03.2024 and the impugned entire proceeding arising out of Special Trial No. 200 of 2024 (State of U.P. vs. Vikas and others) arising out of Case Crime No. 896 of 2023, Under Sections 506, 376D I.P.C. and Section 3(1) (Dha), 3(2) (5) of the Schedule Caste and Schedule Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, Police Station Sector 39 Noida, District Gautam Buddh Nagar, so that justice may kindly be done

Interim Relief: -

To stay further proceedings of Special Trial No. 200 of 2024 (State of U.P. vs. Vikas and others) arising out of Crime No. 896 of 2023, Under Sections 506, 376D I.P.C. and Section 3(1) (Dha), 3(2) (5) of the Schedule Caste and Schedule Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, P.S. Sector 39 Noida, Gautam Buddh Nagar pending in the Court of Special Judge (SC/ST Act), Gautam Buddh Nagar during the pendency of the instant application, otherwise the applicants shall suffer irreparable loss and injury, And/or pass such other order or further direction which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case."

At the very outset, the learned counsel for applicants submits that co-accused Azad approached this Court by means of Application U/S 482 No. 25599 of 2024 (Azad Vs. State of U.P. and Another), wherein an interim order dated 3.10.2024 was passed by this Court. For ready reference the same is reproduced herein under:

"1. Heard Shri Anoop Trivedi, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Sri Vimlendu Tripathi, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Rajrshi Gupta, learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2 and Sri J.K. Upadhyay, learned A.G.A. for the State.

2. The present 482 Cr.P.C. application has been filed to quash the entire proceedings of Special Case No. 200 of 2024 (State of U.P. Vs. Vikas and others) arising out of Case Crime No. 896 of 2023, under Sections 506, 376-D of I.P.C., and Section 3(1)(dha), 3(2)(v) of the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, Police Station- Sector 39 NOIDA, District Gautam Buddha Nagar, as well as cognizance/summoning order dated 27.02.2024 and in alternative quashing the order dated 14.06.2024 whereby the application under Section 173(8) of Cr.P.C. has been rejected pending in the court of Special Judge (SC/ST Act), Gautam Buddha Nagar.

3. Brief facts of the case are that the first information report dated 30.12.2023 has been lodged by the victim against the applicant and 5 other named persons alleging that on 12.06.2023 co-accused Raj Kumar called the first informant with all testimonials to provide employment by co-accused Ravi. On 15.06.2023 after believing on Raj Kumar co- accused Raj Kumar and Mahimi brought the first informant in garden galeria where the vehicle was parked at the same time three other boys came and identified co-accused Ravi and the present applicant and one Vikas and thereafter, co-accused Ravi made her sit in the car and talked to her and all other persons were standing out of the vehicle having firearm, then co-accused Ravi committed rape with her and made a video and threatened her with dire consequences if she informed to any one but due to this fear she did not inform her family members but they torture

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top