IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
RAJEEV MISRA, J.
Vikas And 2 Others – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. and Another – Respondent
APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 1391 of 2025
Decided on : 24-01-2025
(A) Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Section 482 - Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 - Quashing of proceedings - Application filed to quash summoning and cognizance orders in a case involving serious allegations of rape and intimidation - The court noted the need for careful scrutiny of FIRs in frivolous cases and emphasized the importance of considering all circumstances beyond mere allegations. (Paras 8, 9, 12)
(B) Interim Relief - The court granted interim relief by staying further proceedings against the applicants until the next hearing, highlighting the necessity of protecting the liberty of the accused in light of similar cases. (Paras 12, 13)
Facts of the case:
The applicants, charge sheeted in a case involving serious allegations, sought to quash the proceedings initiated against them, claiming the FIR was based on false allegations with ulterior motives. The incident allegedly occurred on 19.06.2023, with the FIR lodged on 30.12.2023, raising questions about the delay and credibility of the complaint.
Findings of Court:
The court found that the matter required consideration and stayed further proceedings against the applicants, indicating the need for a thorough examination of the case's merits.
Issues: The main issues included the validity of the FIR, the delay in lodging it, and the credibility of the allegations made against the applicants.
Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that it is essential to look beyond the FIR in cases of frivolous allegations, considering all attending circumstances to ascertain the necessity of the alleged offence. The court also noted the importance of interim protection for the accused in similar cases.
Result: Further proceedings stayed.
Hon'ble Rajeev Misra,J.
Heard Mr. Vimlendu Tripathi, the learned counsel for applicants, the learned A.G.A. for State and Mr. J.K. Upadhyay, assisted by Mr. Pankaj Upadhyay, the learned counsel representing opposite party-1.
Perused the record.
This application under section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by charge sheeted accused Vikas and 2 Others with the following prayer:
"It is, therefore, most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to:
Final Relief:
To quash the impugned summoning and cognizance order dated 27.02.2024 and 11.03.2024 passed by the court of Special Judge (SC/ST Act), Gautam Buddh Nagar in Special Trial No. 200 of 2024 (State of U.P. vs. Vikas and others) as well as the impugned ist charge sheet and 2nd charge sheet dated 24.02.2024 and 10.03.2024 and the impugned entire proceeding arising out of Special Trial No. 200 of 2024 (State of U.P. vs. Vikas and others) arising out of Case Crime No. 896 of 2023, Under Sections 506, 376D I.P.C. and Section 3(1) (Dha), 3(2) (5) of the Schedule Caste and Schedule Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, Police Station Sector 39 Noida, District Gautam Buddh Nagar, so that justice may kindly be done
Interim Relief: -
To stay further proceedings of Special Trial No. 200 of 2024 (State of U.P. vs. Vikas and others) arising out of Crime No. 896 of 2023, Under Sections 506, 376D I.P.C. and Section 3(1) (Dha), 3(2) (5) of the Schedule Caste and Schedule Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, P.S. Sector 39 Noida, Gautam Buddh Nagar pending in the Court of Special Judge (SC/ST Act), Gautam Buddh Nagar during the pendency of the instant application, otherwise the applicants shall suffer irreparable loss and injury, And/or pass such other order or further direction which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case."
At the very outset, the learned counsel for applicants submits that co-accused Azad approached this Court by means of Application U/S 482 No. 25599 of 2024 (Azad Vs. State of U.P. and Another), wherein an interim order dated 3.10.2024 was passed by this Court. For ready reference the same is reproduced herein under:
"1. Heard Shri Anoop Trivedi, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Sri Vimlendu Tripathi, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Rajrshi Gupta, learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2 and Sri J.K. Upadhyay, learned A.G.A. for the State.
2. The present 482 Cr.P.C. application has been filed to quash the entire proceedings of Special Case No. 200 of 2024 (State of U.P. Vs. Vikas and others) arising out of Case Crime No. 896 of 2023, under Sections 506, 376-D of I.P.C., and Section 3(1)(dha), 3(2)(v) of the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, Police Station- Sector 39 NOIDA, District Gautam Buddha Nagar, as well as cognizance/summoning order dated 27.02.2024 and in alternative quashing the order dated 14.06.2024 whereby the application under Section 173(8) of Cr.P.C. has been rejected pending in the court of Special Judge (SC/ST Act), Gautam Buddha Nagar.
3. Brief facts of the case are that the first information report dated 30.12.2023 has been lodged by the victim against the applicant and 5 other named persons alleging that on 12.06.2023 co-accused Raj Kumar called the first informant with all testimonials to provide employment by co-accused Ravi. On 15.06.2023 after believing on Raj Kumar co- accused Raj Kumar and Mahimi brought the first informant in garden galeria where the vehicle was parked at the same time three other boys came and identified co-accused Ravi and the present applicant and one Vikas and thereafter, co-accused Ravi made her sit in the car and talked to her and all other persons were standing out of the vehicle having firearm, then co-accused Ravi committed rape with her and made a video and threatened her with dire consequences if she informed to any one but due to this fear she did not inform her family members but they torture
The court emphasized the need for careful scrutiny of FIRs in cases involving serious allegations, allowing for interim relief to protect the liberty of the accused until a thorough examination of th....
The prosecution cannot proceed where allegations reflect a civil dispute and lack evidence of criminal conduct, as per principles from SC/ST Act precedents.
The court emphasized that allegations under the SC/ST Act require proof of the accused's awareness of the victim's caste, and misuse of the Act for personal vendetta is impermissible.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the need to prevent the misuse of the provisions of the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and to discourage dis....
(1) Nothing has been done which is beyond jurisdiction and competence of the Special Court, SC/ST (POA) Act.(2) Exercise of the inherent powers to quash the proceedings is called for only in case whe....
The court established that mere allegations of caste-based insults are insufficient to invoke the SC/ST Act unless there is clear evidence of intent to humiliate based on caste and that the incident ....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the limited jurisdiction of the court at the stage of issuing process and the emphasis on prima facie evidence to establish liability.
A charge-sheet filed at the dictate of somebody other than the police would amount to abuse of the process of law and hence the High Court ought to have exercised its inherent powers under Section 48....
The SC/ST Act should not be invoked for civil disputes, and criminal proceedings must not be misused for personal vendettas.
The judgment establishes the principle that when the basic ingredients of the offences are missing in the complaint, permitting such a complaint to continue and compelling the accused to face the cri....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.