SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(All) 2756

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD AT LUCKNOW BENCH
Hon'ble Shree Prakash Singh,J.
Mohd. Azeem – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Ram Singh

JUDGMENT :

Shree Prakash Singh, J.

1. Rejoinder affidavit filed today by the counsel for the applicant is taken on record.

2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material placed on record.

3. The present bail application under Section 438 Cr.PC. has been filed seeking anticipatory bail in case Crime No. 0228 of 2021, under sections 420, 467, 468, 506, 120-B of the IPC, Police Station-Ahirauli, District-Ambedkar Nagar.

4. From perusal of the order sheet, it appears that on 22.11.2024, following order was passed wherein the present applicant has been granted interim anticipatory bail:-

"1. Heard Ms. Seema Upadhyay holding brief of Sri Ram Singh, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Nirmal Kumar Pandey, learned AGA.

2. At the very outset attention has been drawn towards the order dated 24.10.2024 passed by this Court in Criminal Misc. Anticipatory Bail Application u/s 438 Cr.P.C. No. 2435 of 2024 (Waseem Akram vs. State of U.P.) which reads as under:

"Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA for the State and perused the record."

5. The instant anticipatory bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant with the pra

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top