SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(All) 2823

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
Hon'ble Sameer Jain,J.
Subhash Chandra Verma – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Vinay Kumar Tripathi

JUDGMENT :

Sameer Jain, J.

1. Heard Sri Vinay Kumar Tripathi, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Imran Khan, learned AGA for the State.

2. The instant bail application has been filed seeking release of the applicant on bail in Case Crime No. 669 of 2024, under Sections 108, 352, 351(2), 85 B.N.S. and Section 3/4 D.P. Act, Police Station Handia, District Prayagraj during pendency of the trial.

3. FIR of the present case was lodged against applicant and his family members and according to the FIR marriage of the applicant was solemnized with the daughter of the informant on 11.06.2017 and after marriage applicant and his family members used to torture her for dowry and on 23.11.2024 they informed the informant that his daughter fell ill and he should come to the hospital and during treatment on 24.11.2024 his daughter died.

4. Learned counsel for the applicant submits, however, applicant is husband but on the basis of false allegation of demand of dowry and torture he has been made accused in the present matter.

5. He further submits, as per allegation, due to the abatement of the applicant his wife committed suicide but except the bald and verbal allegation of demand of dowry there

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top