Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
MAHESH CHANDRA TRIPATHI, PRASHANT KUMAR
Arena Superstructures Pvt Ltd – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
TABLE OF CONTENTS
| S.N. | Heading | Page Nos. | Para Nos. |
| 1 | Factual Matrix of the Case | 03-08 | 03-19 |
| 2 | Insolvency Proceedings | 08-17 | 20-40 |
| 3 | Argument of the Petitioners (Writ-C No.6041 of 2024) | 18-22 | 41-59 |
| 4 | Argument of the Petitioners (Writ-C No.8447 of 2024) | 22-26 | 60-71 |
| 5 | Argument on behalf of Noida Authority | 27-36 | 72-101 |
| 6 | Insolvency Proceedings | 36-37 | 102-104 |
| 7 | Piercing of Corporate Veil | 37-40 | 105-116 |
| 8 | Non-Development of the Sports Facilities | 40-41 | 117-119 |
| 9 | Interest of Homebuyers | 41-41 | 120-120 |
| 10 | Notice for Payment of Instalments | 41-42 | 121-121 |
| 11 | Change in Shareholdings of Various Companies | 42-50 | 122-122 |
| 12 | Analysis | 50-50 | 123-124 |
| 13 | I-Pre-Insolvency Part | 50-53 | 125-128 |
| 14 | Criminal Complaint/Charge-Sheet | 53-54 | 129-132 |
| 15 | Piercing of Corporate Veil | 55-57 | 133-142 |
| 16 | Money Laundering | 57-61 | 143-150 |
| 17 | II-Post Insolvency | 61-63 | 151-158 |
| 18 | Fraud | 63-66 | 159-165 |
| 19 | Interest of the Homebuyers | 66-68 | 166-174 |
| 20 | High Court’s Interference | 68-70 | 175-183 |
| 21 | Conclusion | 71-71 | 183-183 |
| 22 | Effect on Consortium When a Member of the Consortium goes into the Insolvency | 71-75 | 184-196 |
1. Both the writ petitions have been clubbed and heard together as they involve similar issue, and hence, they are being decided by this common judgement and order.
2. Heard Sri Shashi Nandan, Senior Advocate assist
The court emphasized that insolvency proceedings should not be exploited to evade liabilities, confirming the necessity to protect homebuyers' interests and investigate corporate fraud.
The court emphasized that reverse CIRP cannot be used to evade liabilities, and the interests of homebuyers must be prioritized in insolvency proceedings.
The court emphasized the need to pierce the corporate veil to hold individuals accountable for fraud, asserting judicial authority to intervene in administrative decisions when public interest is com....
The court emphasized the need for accountability in public contracts, allowing judicial review to ensure fairness and public interest, while directing a CBI inquiry into irregularities in the Sports ....
A lead member of a consortium who opts out lacks locus standi to challenge the actions of the authority regarding project delays and cannot claim damages.
The court upheld the initiation of insolvency proceedings against two linked corporate debtors, affirming that the required threshold of financial creditors was satisfied at the time of the petition'....
The court affirmed that once debt and default are established under Section 7 of the IBC, admission into CIRP is mandatory, preventing misuse of the process as merely a recovery mechanism.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
