SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(All) 2931

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD 
Ajay Bhanot, J. 
Tinku Singh – Petitioner
Versus
State of U.P. And Others – Respondents
WRIT - A No. - 6583 of 2022
Decided On : 14-07-2025

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mujib Ahmad Siddiqui
For the Respondent: C.S.C., Krishna Mohan Asthana

Compassionate appointments are exceptions to general recruitment norms, governed by strict eligibility criteria focused on immediate financial hardship following a breadwinner's death.

Headnote:(A) Constitution of India - Articles 12, 14, 15, and 16 - Compassionate appointments - Application for appointment on compassionate grounds was denied on grounds of family income exceeding Rs. 35,000/-; the court emphasized that compassionate appointment is a remedy for immediate financial crisis due to death of breadwinner, and cannot be claimed as a right, but should strictly adhere to eligibility criteria defined by the relevant scheme. (Paras 5, 7, 21, 30-32)

(B) Compassionate appointment as an exception - The ruling clarifies that while general appointments must follow open recruitment procedures, compassionate appointments are exceptions to this rule but must be regulated within defined norms. (Paras 6, 12, 16)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner's father was employed by the respondent bank and died in harness. The application for a compassionate appointment was declined based on family income calculations that included the income of a non-supporting family member, which the petitioner contested.

Findings of Court:
The impugned orders were quashed for failure to consider all necessary factors regarding the family’s financial condition.

Issues: Whether the financial condition of the deceased's family was accurately assessed under the compassionate appointment scheme; the legitimacy of including the employed son’s income in determining family income was also a concern.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that financial conditions must be assessed rigorously, excluding irrelevant considerations, and that compassionate appointments are not automatic rights.

Result: Writ petition allowed, and the case was remitted for reassessment.

Table of Content
1. initial claims regarding financial eligibility for compassionate appointments. (Para 1)
2. facts regarding the petitioner's family conditions and claim. (Para 2 , 3 , 19)
3. discussion on the legal framework guiding public appointments. (Para 4)
4. compassionate appointments as an exceptional measure. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 9 , 10 , 12)
5. criteria for compassionate appointments under constitutional and service law. (Para 11 , 16 , 17)
6. need for rigorous assessment of financial conditions for eligibility. (Para 18)
7. criteria for assessing financial condition in compassionate appointments. (Para 21 , 22 , 27 , 28 , 29)
8. importance of considering all relevant financial factors. (Para 25 , 30 , 31)
9. court's order to review and decide on the claims based on observations. (Para 32 , 33 , 34)

JUDGMENT :

Ajay Bhanot, J.

1. Heard Sri Mujib Ahmad Siddiqui, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Krishna Mohan Asthana, learned counsel assisted by Sri Sagar Srivastava, learned counsel for the respondents.

2. The father of the petitioner was an employee of the respondent bank who died in harness on 12.04.2016. The claim of the petitioner for grant of appointment on compassionate grounds has been declined by the impugned order dated 14.09.2018.

3. The appointment on compassionate ground has been declined on the footing that the total income of the petitioner's family from all sources exceeds the threshold criteria of Rs. 35,000/- per month. Hence the family does not face financial destitution and the applicant is not entitled for appointment on compassionate grounds.

4. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

5. Appointments to public posts, government services and to various instrumentalities of the State within the meaning of Article 12 of the Constitution of India are governed and regulated by comprehensive provisions contained in the Constitution. The constitutional scheme envisages an open recruitment and a transparent procedure which enables maximum participation from eligible segments of the citizenry at large. The final appointments are made after a fair selection based on competitive merit. While making the said appointments the reservation policy or affirmative action under the Constitution for representation and empowerment of backward classes, SCs/STs and other sections of the society identified as per law has to be duly adhered to. The recruitment and appointment to government services and government undertakings were examined by constitutional courts in the context of Articles 14, 15 and 16 of the Constitution of India. Holdings of the constitutional courts have irretrievably entrenched the aforesaid modes and procedures for appointments to posts in the government and Article 12 instrumentalities in the body of the constitutional law.

6. On the contrary compassionate ground appointments are not made through a transparent and public process of recruitment after inviting the applications from the open market. The appointments on compassionate ground entail deviation from regular processes of recruitment, and are an exception to the aforesaid constitutionally mandated scheme for appointments to posts in the government and in government undertakings. Compassionate appointments emanate from specific service rules holding the field and have been rationalized by service law jurisprudence evolved by Constitutional Courts.

7. The appointments on compassionate ground passed the test of constitutional validity by a slender margin. Dependents of a deceased employee face unforeseen financial destitution after the death of the latter and need urgent succour. Compassionate appointments are made only to enable the family of the deceased employee to tide over the immediate financial crisis caused by the death of the earning member of the family. This feature alone constituted the dependent kin of a deceased employee into one class and on this sole footing the rationale of compassionate ground appointments was justified by Constitutiona

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top