SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(All) 3501

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
Sudhir Agarwal
Khudawand Haiyul Qaiyum – Appellant
Versus
State Of U.P. – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Appellant :- K.M.L. Hajela, B.B. Jauhari, Haji Iqbal Ahmad

JUDGMENT

Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal. J.

1. This is plaintiff's appeal under Section 100 C.P.C.

2. Heard Sri B.B. Jauhari, Advocate, for appellant and learned Standing Counsel for respondents.

3. A suit for declaration that plaintiff is owner of Zamindari Abolition Compensation Bonds and Rehabilitation Grant Bonds detailed at the foot of the plaint and present Mutwalli is entitled to get the principle amount and interest from the said bonds being Mutwalli of the plaintiff-wakf was filed in the Court of Civil Judge, Shahjahanpur which was decreed by Trial Court vide judgment and decree dated 17.3.1975 where against defendants preferred Civil Appeal No. 44 of 1975 which has been allowed and Trial Court's judgment and decree has been set aside as a result whereof the suit of the plaintiff-appellant has been dismissed.

4. The Lower Appellate Court (hereinafter referred to as "LAC") formulated the question as to whether the waqf-deed dated 22.5.1945 was actually implemented or not and in this regard considered following aspects:

(i) The income and expenditure of Wakf property were not maintained properly.

(ii) Wakf was not registered in the Wakf Board at any stage.

5. In that view of the matter, h

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top