Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
SANDEEP JAIN
Deen Dayal Pipraiya – Appellant
Versus
Ram Sharan – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of temple management and disputes. (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. defendant's acceptance of prior ownership and management claims. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 3. application of res judicata in civil suits. (Para 9 , 11) |
| 4. arguments concerning trial court's dismissal based on res judicata. (Para 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 5. court's analysis on the misuse of order 7 rule 11. (Para 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 21) |
| 6. final decision to set aside trial court's order. (Para 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27) |
JUDGMENT :
SANDEEP JAIN, J.
1. The instant appeal under Section 96 C.P.C. has been preferred by the plaintiff in O.S. No. 205 of 2016, Deen Dayal Pipraiya (Deceased) through LRs. vs. Ram Sharan against the judgment and decree dated 10.11.2017 passed by the Court of Sri Radhey Mohan Srivastava, Civil Judge (Senior Division), Jhansi whereby the plaintiff’s suit for the relief of permanent injunction has been dismissed under Order 7 Rule 11(d) C.P.C. on the ground that it is barred by res judicata under Section 11 C.P.C.
2. Factual matrix is that the plaintiff-appellant filed O.S. No.205 of 2016 in the lower court with the averments that Sri Thakur Maithli Raman Jee Maharaj, Virajman Mandir Kunj i.e. plaintif
The trial court erred in dismissing the plaintiff's suit based on res judicata without considering evidence appropriately, reaffirming that this issue requires detailed examination beyond mere plaint....
The principle of res judicata bars re-litigation of matters already decided, confirming that the earlier judgment is binding and the current suit is not maintainable.
The principle of res judicata cannot serve as a basis for rejecting a plaint under Order VII Rule 11 of the CPC; it must be framed as a preliminary issue in trial.
A plaint can only be rejected under Order 7 Rule 11(d) if it fails to disclose a cause of action or is barred by law, without regard to evidence or defenses raised in the written statement.
An application for plaint rejection under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC only evaluates the plaint's contents without considering the defendant's defense. Res judicata principles need comprehensive analysis bey....
Plea of res judicata cannot be decided under Order VII Rule 11 CPC, as it requires scrutiny of prior suits' pleadings and judgments beyond plaint averments alone.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
