SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(All) 3120

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
VIKRAM D. CHAUHAN, J.
Shivam And 3 Others - Appellant 
Versus 
State of U.P. and Another - Respondent 
Application U/S 482 No.15400 of 2018
Decided on : 03-09-2025

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mahipal Singh
For the Respondent: G.A., Rajesh Kumar Pandey

In sale transactions, mere stipulations regarding loan payment do not establish criminal liability for breach of trust, especially where obligations are fulfilled and no dishonesty is shown.

Headnote:(A) Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Section 482 - Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 406 and 120-B - Quashing of charge sheet - Applicants, a family, misled into purchasing land with outstanding loan - No entrustment of property established; transaction considered a sale - Liability for unpaid loan deemed a civil matter, not criminal - Charges quashed. (Paras 10, 18, 21)

(B) Legal principles - No entrustment implied in sale - Payment of agricultural loan addressed; no clues of dishonest intent found - Mere breach of contract does not invoke criminal offence under Section 406 IPC. (Paras 18, 21)

Facts of the case:
Applicants accused of fraud related to sale of land with an encumbering loan; they contested criminal charges, claiming loan was repaid and no malfeasance was present.

Findings of Court:
Transaction deemed a sale, not a trust; Applicants cleared loan, validated with a no dues certificate from the bank.

Issues: Whether a sale transaction can create a criminal liability under IPC and if the Applicants fulfilled their financial commitments.

Ratio Decidendi: No criminal breach of trust occurred as ownership transferred without trust obligations, thus criminal charges unfounded.

Result: Application allowed, charges quashed.

Table of Content
1. quashing of charge sheet for lack of evidence. (Para 3 , 4)
2. loan repayment details influence ownership transfer. (Para 6 , 7 , 10)
3. transaction completion demonstrates no liability. (Para 8 , 9 , 11)
4. opposition claims against applicants' repayment. (Para 12 , 13 , 14)
5. sale deed stipulations regarding loan payment. (Para 17 , 18)
6. no criminal liability in case of sale contract breach. (Para 20 , 21)
7. criminal proceedings quashed based on repayment. (Para 22)

JUDGMENT :

Vikram D. Chauhan, J.

1. Heard learned counsel for the Applicants and learned A.G.A. for the State. No one appears on behalf of Opposite party no.2.

2. By order dated 18.4.2024, Opposite party no.2 was proceeded ex- parte. On 29.7.2025 also no one appeared on behalf of opposite party no.2.

3. This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is preferred by Applicants for quashing the impugned charge sheet dated 3.6.2017 in Criminal Case No.1702 of 2017, State Vs. Shivam and others , arising out of Case Crime No.107 of 2017, under Sections 406 , 120-B I.P.C., Police Station Badhapur, District Bijnor.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel for Applicants that Applicant nos.1 and 3 are the real brothers. Applicant nos.2 and 4 are mother and father of Applicant nos.1 and 3. On 4.3.2017, present first information report was lodged by Opposite party no.2 against Applicants. It is alleged in first information report that informant Manju Tyagi and Manish Tyagi executed a sale deed in favour of Shivam Agarwal (Applicant no.1) on 6.4.2015 of agricultural land area 3.618 hectare situated at Mauja Bhajrawala Jagir, Pargana Badhapur, District-Bijnor including liability of agricultural debt. Shivam Agarwal and his father Hari Om Agarwal assured to pay the bank loan. On the same day i.e. 6.4.2015 his sister Monika Tyagi also executed a sale deed in favour of Smt. Rashmi Agarwal of agricultural land, area 1.070 hectare situated at Mauja Ramdas Bairagai, Pargana Badhapur, District Bijnor including liability of agricultural loan upon the said land. Rashmi Agarwal, her husband Hari Om Agarwal and their son Lavi Agarwal assured to pay the aforesaid bank loan. The loan amount was Rs.9,65,000/- from Punjab National Bank, Badhapur. It is alleged that they have not paid the aforesaid loan amount.

5. Investigating Officer investigated the matter and has recorded the statement of the informant and witnesses of the fact, namely, Smt. Manju Tyagi-informant and witnesses Smt. Manisha Tyagi, Smt. Monika Tyagi, Mohit Tyagi and Satendra Tyagi under Section 161 Cr.P.C. Thereafter, the Investigating Officer submitted charge sheet against Applicants under Sections 406 , 120-B I.P.C. on 3.6.2017.

6. Learned counsel for Applicants submits that the father of opposite party no.2 and Monika Tyagi was posted as Sub-Inspector at Police Station-Kotwali, Najibabad, Bijnor in the year 2015. Applicants are businessmen and they are carrying business at Najibabad, Bijnor. The father of opposite party no.2 stated to Applicant no.1 to sell abovenoted agricultural land. He concealed the fact of loan amount, taken upon the said agricultural land. The Applicant no.1 trusted upon the father of opposite party no.2 and gave Rs.10 lacs as advance amount for purchasing the aforesaid agricultural land. Thereafter, the Applicant no.1 made a query from the revenue department and found that there is agricultural loan of Punjab National Bank upon the said agricultural land. The Applicant nos.1 and 3 requested to return the advance amount of Rs.10 lacs due to agricultural loan upon the aforesaid land. But the father of the opposite party no.2 denied to return the aforesaid advance amount.

7. It is further submitted by learned counsel for the Applicants that thereafter, Applicant no.1 had to compromise and got executed sale deed in his favour, executed by opposite party no.2 and her sister Manisha Tyagi and another sale deed in favour of his mother Smt. Rashmi Agarwal executed by another daughter of opposite part

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top