Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL
Kamta Prasad – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Rohit Ranjan Agarwal, J.
1. The land of petitioner was acquired for road widening by National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) invoking Section 3A of National Highways Act, 1956 (hereinafter called as "the Act of 1956") in the year 2017. The competent authority/Additional District Magistrate made an award on 29.05.2018. An objection was filed by petitioner against the said award which was rejected on 15.12.2021 and the award dated 29.05.2018 was confirmed.
2. Petitioner filed application under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter called as "the Act of 1996") for setting aside the arbitral award dated 29.05.2018 and 15.12.2021. During the pendency of the said application, petitioner moved an application for filing of certain documents which were kept in some box and came to his knowledge on 20.10.2024, which led to filing of an application on 22.10.2024. The court below by order impugned dated 09.12.2024 considering the said application to be under Order XLI Rule 27 CPC has rejected the same. Hence, the present writ petition.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that court below had wrongly rejected the application holding it to be
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
