Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
Saurabh Shyam Shamshery
Neha Sharm – Appellant
Versus
State Of U.P. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. participation in recruitment and reservation claims. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 6) |
| 2. failed arguments of the state regarding reservation application. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. importance of necessary party joinder in judgments. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 4. vertical vs horizontal reservation principles established. (Para 9) |
| 5. directions regarding separate merit list formation. (Para 10) |
| 6. disposal of writ petitions. (Para 11) |
JUDGMENT :
SAURABH SHYAM SHAMSHERY, J.
1. In the present case there are two sets of petitioners, who have participated in a recruitment for the selection of Sub Inspector (Civil Police)/Platoon Commander PAC/FSSO Fire Service and remained unsuccessful, whereas selected candidates, after completing their training, are posted at their respective places. None of the likely affected selected candidates was made party respondent in present bunch of writ petitions, despite pending for last 3 years.
2. First set of petitioners are woman, who belongs to Economical Weaker Section and are claiming complete and independent 20 percent horizontal women reservation (181 seats) under total EWS reservation i.e. 10 percent vertical reservation of entire EWS quota (902 seats) out of of total (9027
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
