Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
CHANDRA KUMAR RAI
Sanjeev Kumar Agrawal – Appellant
Versus
State Of UP – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. explanation of delay in filing review application. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. limitations concerning review proceedings. (Para 5 , 7 , 10 , 11) |
| 3. final decision on the review application. (Para 6 , 12) |
| 4. dispute over property rights and statutory provisions. (Para 8 , 9) |
| 5. rejection of the review application. (Para 13) |
JUDGMENT :
Chandra Kumar Rai, J.
Order on Civil Misc. Delay Condonation Application
1. Heard Sri H.N.Singh, learner senior counsel assisted by Sri Rishabh Srivastava along with Sri Ashish Kumar Dwivedi, learned counsel for the applicants and Sri Ashok Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the opposite party respondent Nos.6, 7, 8 and 9 and Sri Tarun Gaur, learned standing counsel for the State-respondents.
2. Stamp reporter has reported laches of 222 days in filing the instant review application which has been properly explained in the application as well as affidavit filed on behalf of the applicants.
3. The explanation given for delay of 222 days in filing the review application is satisfactory.
4. The delay in filing the review application is condoned.
Order on Review Application
1. Heard Sri H.N. Singh, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Sri Rishabh Srivastava a
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
