Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
JASPREET SINGH
Rama Kant – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. property devolvement after kesar's death (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 2. arguments on remand and rightful heirs (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 3. previous findings and their binding nature (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 4. jurisdictional error in remand decision (Para 18 , 19 , 21) |
| 5. conclusion and order affirming mutation (Para 22 , 23) |
JUDGMENT :
JASPREET SINGH, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents. Sri Adarsh Kumar Maurya, learned counsel has put in appearance on behalf of private respondent no. 3 and has filed his counter affidavit which is taken on record.
2. The office report dated 02.11.2022 indicates that service on the private respondents is complete, however, it is only the private respondent no. 3 who is contesting the proceedings.
3. Under challenge is the order dated 26.04.2022 whereby the revision preferred by the private respondent no. 3 has been allowed and the matter was remanded to the Trial Court for decision afresh.
4. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the property in question belonged to one Sri Kesar son of Doober. Upon his death, the name of his widow namely Smt. Surat
Revisional Courts must decide issues based on undisputed facts rather than remanding unless justified by jurisdictional error; findings from summary proceedings do not bind subsequent litigation.
Mutation proceedings do not determine property title; unresolved title claims must be pursued through appropriate legal channels rather than summary processes.
Mutation proceedings - There is no finding recorded either by Appellate Court or by Revisional Court as to who was in actual possession of property in question and therefore liable to pay revenue to ....
Mutation proceedings are summary and do not determine substantive rights; ongoing civil suits concerning property rights take precedence in adjudication.
Mutation proceedings are summary in nature and findings do not bind parties in subsequent civil suits regarding the same matter.
The court affirmed that a party cannot challenge a mutation order after losing title proceedings, emphasizing the necessity of full disclosure of prior litigation.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
