Back
G. S. AHLUWALIA
Harendra Singh (Manmod) – Appellant
Versus
Govind Singh – Respondent
ORDER
1. This Petition under Article 227 of Constitution of India has been filed seeking following reliefs:
“(i) The Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to quash Impugned order dated 29.7.2019 (Annexure P/4) passed by learned Sub Divisional Officer, Begumganj, District Raisen (MP) and Impugned order dated 28.12.2020 (Annexure P/6) passed by the learned Collector District Raisen (MP) in the interest of justice.
(ii) Any other relief which this Hon’ble Court may deem just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case may kindly be issued in favour of the Petitioner along with cost of the petition.”
2. It is the case of petitioners that petitioner No.1 and respondents are legal heirs of Late Gurdayal Singh Patel. The disputed property i.e. Khasra Nos.317, 404, 502, 665, 667, 671, 674, 716 and 717 admeasuring 12.279 hectares situated at village Hipsli, Tahsil Begumganj, District Raisen, was owned by Late Gurdayal Singh. Gurdayal Singh Patel passed away in the year 1992 and after his death, property was mutated in the name of his widow wife, namely; Smt. Tulsa Bai by order dated 27.03.1992. After a lapse of more than 28 years, respondents No.6 to 10 filed an appeal before SDO,
(1) Mutation entry does not confer any right, title or interest in favour of person and mutation entry in revenue record is only for fiscal purpose.(2) Title of property can only be decided by a comp....
Mutation proceedings are summary and do not confer title; title must be established in a regular suit.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
