Back
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD, LUCKNOW BENCH
PANKAJ BHATIA
Ratan Buildtech Private Limited – Appellant
Versus
Anil Kumar – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. arguments presented by the parties regarding interest and compensation. (Para 1 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 2. nature of the complaint filed by allottee. (Para 4 , 9 , 19) |
| 3. interpretation and implications of the rera act. (Para 21 , 22 , 25 , 26) |
| 4. validity of interest claims under rera. (Para 39 , 42) |
| 5. conclusion and final order of the court. (Para 43 , 44) |
JUDGMENT :
PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard Sri Sudeep Kumar along with Mahima Pahwa and Sri Prashant Kumar Singh, learned Counsels appearing on behalf of the appellants and Sri Azhar Ikram along with Sri Manish Singh, learned Counsels appearing on behalf of the respondents-allottee. Sri Azhar Ikram also appears on behalf of the appellant-allottee in RERA Appeal No.70 of 2025.
2. The RERA Appeal Defective No.18; RERA Appeal Defective No.19 of 2025; RERA Appeal Defective No.20 of 2025 and RERA Appeal Defective No.25 of 2025 have been filed along with an application for condonation of delay. The cause shown are sufficient. The applications for condonation of delay are allowed. The delay in filing the appeals are condoned.
3. All the abovesaid appeals arise out of the same judgment passed by the U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal, a
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
