Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
JASPREET SINGH
Rampati – Appellant
Versus
Deputy Director Of Consolidation, Sultanpur – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Jaspreet Singh, J.
1. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioner no.1 namely Smt. Ramapti has inadvertently been mentioned as a party while she had already expired and accordingly the petitioners may be permitted to carry out necessary correction in the array of parties.
2. Learned Standing Counsel and Shri Mohan Singh for the Gaon Sabha submit that they have no objections in case C.M.A No.Nil dated 4.2.2025 is allowed.
3. This Court finds that the said application is merely formal in nature and does not impact the merits of the case and accordingly the application is allowed. Learned counsel for the petitioners is directed to carry out the necessary amendment, forthwith.
4. Heard Shri Mohiuddin Khan, learned counsel for the petitioners, Dr. Krishna Singh, learned Standing Counsel for the respondent nos.1 to 3 and 5 and Shri Mohan Singh, learned counsel for respondent no.4/Gaon Sabha.
5. Under challenge is the order passed by the Deputy Director of Consolidation, Sultanpur dated 30.3.2024 whereby the revision of the petitioners was dismissed as a consequence the order passed by the Settlement Officer of Conso0lidation dated 1.1.2009 as well as the judgement an
The legitimacy of property rights hinges on lawful succession and adherence to consolidation laws; deeds executed without proper ownership are invalid.
A recorded tenant's consent is essential for an unrecorded co-tenant to acquire Bhumidhari rights; absence of such consent invalidates claims to ownership.
A recorded tenant's written consent is essential for an unrecorded co-tenant to acquire privileges under the United Provinces Agricultural Tenants Act.
It is worthy to note that on the death of a female bhumidhar succession to holding goes not to her heirs but to "nearest surviving heir of the last male bhumidhar". In other words it is the heirs of ....
The court affirmed the concurrent findings regarding co-tenancy rights and ancestral property, dismissing the writ petition due to lack of merit.
Orders and titles obtained through fraud are nullities; rightful ownership should not be barred by procedural delays attributable to such fraud.
The court held that succession rights require substantiated proof of parentage, emphasizing the need for reliable documentation in inheritance claims under the U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act.
Tenure Land - Once a dispute was recorded by Assistant Consolidation Officer and on objection being filed same was referred to Consolidation Officer, it is incumbent to Consolidation Officer to decid....
Co-owners cannot claim adverse possession against each other; such possession must be open, hostile, and continuous, proven according to legal standards.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
