JUDGMENT :

Rajnish Kumar,J.

1. Heard, Sri R.R. Upadhyaya, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Aftab Ahmad, Advocate holding brief of Sri M.A.Siddiqui, learned counsel for the respondents no. 2 and 3. Notice on behalf of respondent no.1 has been accepted by learned Chief Standing Counsel.

2. The instant writ petition has been filed challenging the order dated 27.11.2004 passed by the Deputy Director of Consolidation, Faizabad (respondent no.1) in Revision No.986/165.

3. The brief facts, for adjudication of the present case, are that the land in dispute relating to Khata No.169 situated in Village-Chandipur Nagahra was recorded in the name of Tulsi Ram son of Ram Sanehi, Khata No.87 situated in Bansawa was recorded in the name of Ram Sanehi son of Sahti and Khata No.857 situated in the Village- Mehdauna was recorded in the name of Tulsi Ram son of Ram Sanehi in the basic year. The dispute was also recorded, showing the mistake and on the basis of enquiry, that the petitioners are the cotenure holders of the land in dispute so their names should also be recorded. On publication of r