Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
SIDDHARTHA VARMA
Anugrah Narayan Singh – Appellant
Versus
Harsh Vardhan Bajpayee – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. filing of election petition (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments for striking off paragraphs and applications (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. judicial standards for election petitions (Para 6 , 7) |
| 4. legality of pleadings in election petitions (Para 8 , 10) |
| 5. necessity of detailed pleadings in election cases (Para 9 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 19 , 20) |
| 6. court's discretion in retaining or striking pleadings (Para 24 , 30 , 31) |
| 7. result of applications filed (Para 26 , 28) |
| 8. order for further proceedings in election petition (Para 33) |
JUDGMENT :
Siddhartha Varma, J.
Civil Misc. Application No.4 of 2022 (Under Order VI Rule 16 CPC)
AND
Civil Misc. Application No.5 of 2022 (Under Order VII Rule 11(a) CPC read with Section 86 (1) of the Representation of the People Act, 1951)
1. The instant Election Petition was filed by the election petitioner to declare the election of the respondent-returned candidate as Member of Legislative Assembly from 262 Allahabad North Assembly Constituency, Prayagraj (Allahabad) null and void and also to set-aside the election. When the petition was filed, the respondent i.e. the elected Member of Legislative Assembly filed an application under Order VI Rule 16 of t
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
