Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
VINOD DIWAKAR
Subhash Chandra – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. background on the complainant's father's businesses and alleged forgery. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. investigation outcomes and lack of key evidence. (Para 4 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37) |
| 3. parties' arguments regarding the investigation's fairness and reliability. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. court's observations on investigation standards. (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 5. critique of traditional investigative practices and need for reforms. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 18 , 22) |
| 6. court's decision to quash fir based on malicious prosecution. (Para 38 , 39) |
| 7. final orders on police training and compliance. (Para 40 , 41 , 42) |
JUDGMENT :
Vinod Diwakar, J.
1. Heard Shri N.I. Zafri, learned Senior Counsel, assisted by Shri Gaurav Pundir, learned counsel for the applicants, Shri S.K. Mishra, learned counsel for the complainant and learned Additional Advocate General, assisted by Shri J.K. Upadhyay, learned A.G.A. for the State-respondent.
2. Succinctly, the crux of the allegations are that the complainant's father had four shops in his name bearing no.7/11, 7/1, 7/2, 7/8, and his mother had two shops in her name bearing No. 7/11 and 7/4, respectively, situated at Ramganj, Sarai Hakeem Bannaderi, District Aligarh. Petit
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
