SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(All) 2568

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
SAURABH SHYAM SHAMSHERY
Gaon Sabha – Appellant
Versus
Board of Revenue – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants : V.K. Singh, Anuj Kumar, Azad Rai, D.D. Chauhan, Mahesh Narain Singh, Navin Kumar, Rajesh Yadav, Sanjay Goswami, Sunil Kumar Singh
For the Respondents: Alok Kumar Yadav, Alok Mishra, Anil Kumar Dubey, Azad Rai, Chandra Bhan Dubey, Dinesh Chandra Srivastava, Indra Raj Singh, K.K.Pandey, Kaushalendra Nath Singh, Kaushlendra Nath Singh, Manu Saxena, N.K. Singh, Om Prakash Singh, Pankaj Dubey, R.K. Singh, R.K. Soni, Rajeev Misra, Ram Surat Saroj, Ram Surat Singh, Ramesh Chandra Singh, S.A.V. Chahar, S.A.V. Chaturvedi, S.D. Kautilya, Sanjay Mishra, V. Singh, Vineet Pandey

Table of Content
1. land status and allotment procedures (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
2. arguments regarding pasture land integrity (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12)
3. court's observations on procedural requirements (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18)
4. illegal government decision on land allotment (Para 19)
5. conclusion on the writ petition's resolution (Para 20)

JUDGMENT :

Saurabh Shyam Shamshery, J.

Impleadment Application No.55 of 2021

Heard, learned counsel for applicant (New Okhla Industrial Development Authority) and Sri Suresh Chandra Verma, learned counsel for contesting respondents.

I find merit in the submission of learned counsel for applicant as well as grounds mentioned in application which are sufficient to allow the application for impleadment and accordingly, allowed and it is directed that applicant be impleaded as petitioner No.2 in memo of party. Amended cause title be filed and necessary correction be carried out.

Order on memo of petition

1. Heard Sri Sunil Kumar Singh, learned counsel for Gaon Sabha, Sri Kaushalendra Nath Singh, learned counsel for NOIDA and Sri Suresh Chandra Verma, learned counsel for respondent.

2. The present case is arising out of a proceedings under Section 198 (4) of U

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top