HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
ARUN KUMAR SINGH DESHWAL, J.
Krishna Alias Kishna – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. – Opp. Party
Criminal MISC. Bail Application No. 33908 of 2025
Decided On : 10-11-2025
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. bail application procedural background. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. investigation and medical examination issues. (Para 3 , 6 , 14) |
| 3. court's critical observations on negligence. (Para 4 , 5 , 8) |
| 4. supreme court guidance on bail criteria. (Para 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 5. importance of adherence to bail policies. (Para 12 , 13 , 16) |
| 6. granting of bail with specific conditions. (Para 17 , 18 , 19) |
JUDGMENT :
ARUN KUMAR SINGH DESHWAL, J.
1. Heard Sri Mithilesh Kr. Shukla, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri D.P.S. Chauhan, learned A.G.A. and perused the record.
2. The instant bail application has been filed with a prayer to release the applicant on bail in Case Crime No. 278 of 2025, under Sections 110 , 115(2), 118(1), 352, 351(2) BNS , P.S. Shikohabad, District Firozabad, during the pendency of the trial.
3. This matter was heard on 13.10.2025 and again on 30.10.2025. In compliance of the order dated 13.10.2025 I.O of this case Mr. Faisal Khan (S.I.) and Dr. Ashwani Kumar Pachauri are present. On 13.10.2025 the following order was passed:-
"1. Heard Sri Mithilesh Kumar Shukla, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri D.P.S. Chauhan, learned AGA for the State.
2. This matter was heard on 07.10.2025 and the court has passed the following order:
"1. Heard Sri Mithilesh Kr. Shukla, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri D.P.S. Chauhan, learned A.G.A. for the State.
2. The instant application has been filed to enlarge the applicant on bail in case crime no. 278 of 2025, under Sections 110 , 115(2), 118(1), 352, 351(2) BNS , P.S. Shikohabad, District Firozabad.
3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that general allegation has been made against the applicant and other co-accused and as per the doctor, no bony injury was found on the skull of injured Sunny. In support of his contention, learned counsel for the applicant has relied upon statement of Dr. Ashwani Kr. Pachauri, Physician, Raj Narayan Maheshwari Sanyukt Chikitsalaya, Shikohabad, who has stated that he had conducted the medical examination of the injured Sunny on 2.5.2025 which was followed by X-ray of his injuries and no bony injury was found on the skull of the injured. However, CT Scan of the injured (Annexure No.4) dated 3.5.2025 shows that there is comminuted depressed fracture of anterior and posterior wall of both frontal sinus with hemosinus.
4. This Court, just to take medical opinion, regarding the medical report, summoned Dr. P.C. Dubey and Dr. U.B. Singh from the High Court Dispensary who advised that comminuted depressed fracture can easily be detected in an X-ray which is serious in nature and they also pointed out that the statement of Dr. Ashwani Kr. Pachauri needs to be verified with the original X-ray plate by which the skull injury of the injured Sunny was conducted.
5. In such view of the matter, this Court directs the Investigating Officer of this case as well as Dr. Ashwani Kr. Pachauri to appear before this Court along with the original X-ray plate of the skull injury of the injured Sunny before this Court on 13.10.2025 at 10:00 AM.
6. S.S.P., Firozabad as well as C.M.O., Firozabad are directed to ensure presence of the concerned I.O. and Dr. Ashwani Kr. Pachori, respectively, before this Court on the next date of listing.
7. Put up this case on 13.10.2025 as fresh.
8. Registrar (Compliance) is directed to communicate this order forthwith to the S.S.P., Firozabad as well as C.M.O., Firozabad for compliance."
3. In compliance of the above order, Investigating Officer of this case, Faisal Khan, Sub-Inspector posted at Police Station-Shikohabad as well as Dr. Ashwani Kumar Pachauri, Physician posted at Raj Narayan Maheshwari Sanyukt Chikitsalaya, Shikohabad, are present.
4. On making enquiry, Dr. Ashwani Kumar Pachauri opined that if comminuted depressed fracture is detected in CT scan on 03.05.2025, the same can also be corrected through X-ray on 31.05.2025 because healing of fracture in skull takes time and same is also the opinion of Dr. U.B. Singh posted in Hi
Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another
Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.