SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(All) 3444

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
Neeraj Tiwari
Jagdish Prasad – Appellant
Versus
Pandit Ram Shanker Mishra Trust – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Rishabh Agarwal
For the Respondent: Rahul Sahai

JUDGMENT :

Neeraj Tiwari, J.

1. Heard Sri Rishabh Agarwal, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Rahul Sahai, learned counsel for the respondent.

2. Present petition has been filed for setting aside the order dated 1.3.2025 passed by the ADJ, Court No.26, Agra in SCCR No.47 of 2024.

3. Brief facts of the case are that earlier SCC Suit No. 61 of 2021 was instituted by the respondent/plaintiff seeking decree of eviction and recovery of arrears of rent. Thereafter, written Statement has also been filed by the petitioner-defendant with the specific plea about the execution of lease deed dated 23.2.2011 in favour of Shri S.K. Agarwal and two others. Petitioner-defendant has filed application under Order 1 Rule 10 of CPC on 14.12.2021 to implead the lessee of the respondent- plaintiff, which was allowed vide order dated 6.4.2024. Against that, plaintiff-respondent has preferred SCC Revision No. 47 of 2024, which was allowed vide order dated 1.3.2025 and matter was remanded back to decide the matter afresh. Hence the present petition.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that between the petitioner-defendant and respondent-plaintiff, SCC Suit No. 61 of 2021 is pending. Petitione

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top