Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD, LUCKNOW BENCH
Irshad Ali
Hanif Khan – Appellant
Versus
Additional Commissioner Lucknow – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. common judgment for multiple writ petitions. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. petitioners seek quashing of previous court orders. (Para 3) |
| 3. background on auction and land title. (Para 4) |
| 4. arguments regarding jurisdiction and lack of notice. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 5. legal standards for auction according to u.p. laws. (Para 9 , 10) |
| 6. judicial precedents regarding natural justice. (Para 11 , 12) |
| 7. importance of hearing before adverse decisions. (Para 13 , 14) |
| 8. orders passed without hearing are invalid. (Para 15 , 16) |
| 9. orders quashed and remanded for fresh decision. (Para 18 , 19 , 20) |
JUDGMENT :
Irshad Ali, J.
1. Heard Shri M.A. Khan, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Shri Mohd. Aslam Khan, learned counsel for the petitioners as well as Shri Shadab Khan, learned Advocate in Case:- WRIT-C No.1002036 OF 2003, 1001836 OF 2003, 1001637 OF 2003, 1001638 OF 2003 and Shri Hari Om Rana, learned counsel for the petitioners in Case:-WRIT-C No.1002037 OF 2003 and 1002065 OF 2003 and learned Standing Counsel for the respondents-State.
2. This bunch of writ petitions is being decided by means of a common judgment and order treating Writ-C No.1002036 of 2003 to be leading writ petition and the jud
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
