Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
RAJIV LOCHAN SHUKLA
Sweta Jaiswal – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. introduction of the case and initial observations. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. observations on the lack of response from the opposite party. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 4. analysis of legal grounds for maintenance claims under hindu marriage act. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 5. final decision and remand of the case for reconsideration. (Para 13 , 16) |
JUDGMENT :
Rajiv Lochan Shukla, J.
1. Heard Learned counsel for the revisionist, learned A.G.A. for the State-respondents and perused the material brought on the record.
2. The present criminal revision has been preferred against the impugned order dated 2.11.2017 passed by the Principal Judge, Family Court, Chandauli in Maintenance Petition No.332 of 2015 (Sweta Jaiswal and another Vs. Santosh Jaiswal) under Section 125 Cr.P.C ., whereby the claim for maintenance by the revisionist Sweta Jaiswal has been refused. However, the claim for maintenance for her minor daughter has been allowed to the tune of Rs. 2,000/- per month.
3. From the perusal of the records, it transpires that the notices were issued by this Court, which were duly served upon the opposite party No.2 on 25.1.2018, now even thereafter despite passing of several perempto
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
