Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
ARUN KUMAR SINGH DESHWAL
Nirmala Devi – Appellant
Versus
State Of U.P. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. appellant's maintenance application background. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. preliminary objections regarding appeal's maintainability. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. discussion of appeal provisions under family courts act and cr.p.c. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 4. nature of proceedings under section 340 cr.p.c. (Para 16 , 17) |
| 5. clarification on appeal filing procedure. (Para 18 , 19) |
| 6. final conclusion on the appeal's rejection. (Para 20 , 21) |
JUDGMENT :
ARUN KUMAR SINGH DESHWAL, J.
1. Heard Sri Chetan Prakash, Advocate, holding brief of Sri Ajai Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for the appellant, Sri Pawan Kumar Dubey, Advocate, holding brief of Sri Santosh Kumar Tiwari, learned counsel for respondent nos.2, 3 and 4 and Sri D.P.S. Chauhan, learned AGA for the State.
2. The appellant-applicant has preferred the present criminal appeal against the judgment and order dated 10.10.2024 passed by the Learned Principal Judge Family Court, Prayagraj/Allahabad, in Misc. Case No. 414 of 2024, Police Station Kydganj, District Prayagraj, whereby the application filed by the appellant under Section 340 Cr.P.C. (corresponding to Section 379 BNSS) read with Section 191, 193, 199 and
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
