SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(All) 3513

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
SIDDHARTHA VARMA, MADAN PAL SINGH, JJ.
Navneet Sachan – Petitioner
 Versus 
State of U.P. And Others – Respondents
Criminal MISC. Writ Petition No. 16946 of 2024 With Application U/S 528 BNSS No. 40591 of 2024 With Criminal MISC. Writ Petition No. 17602 of 2024 With Criminal MISC. Writ Petition No. 18422 of 2024
Decided On : 26-09-2025

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners:Abhishek Kumar Mishra, Chandrakesh Mishra, Sr. Advocate
For the Respondents: G.A.

The preparation and approval of a gang chart under the Gangster Act must involve substantive findings that demonstrate the gang's threat to public order, or it results in an empty formality negating the validity of associated FIRs.

Headnote:(A) U.P. Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 - Sections 2 and 3 - The petitioner challenges an FIR under the Gangster Act claiming procedural impropriety in the preparation of a gang chart - Prior meeting's due discussion was found to be an empty formality without necessary findings. (Paras 3, 9, 10, 11)

(B) Procedural Requirements - Under Rule 5 of the Gangster Rules, 2021, a gang chart must be prepared and approved following a thorough discussion to determine a gang's impact on public order. (Paras 3, 9)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner was accused of being part of a gang based on a FIR which was challenged for lack of evidence showing his involvement in criminal activities or public disorder. (Para 5)

Findings of Court:
The FIR was quashed due to lack of prima facie evidence in the gang chart and insufficient discussion by officials regarding the petitioner’s alleged criminality. (Paras 10, 12)

Issues: The key issue was whether the gang chart preparation complied with due process before lodging the FIR under the Gangster Act.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that without substantive findings in the due discussion, the gang chart merely represented an empty formality and failed to justify the FIR, breaching procedural requirements of the Gangster Rules.

Result: The writ petition is allowed; the FIR and gang-chart are quashed.

Table of Content
1. challenge of fir under gangster act (Para 1 , 2)
2. emphasis on compliance with gangster rules (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
3. arguments regarding petitioner's involvement (Para 7 , 8)
4. court analysis of due discussion requirements (Para 9 , 10)
5. conclusion quashing of fir and gang chart (Para 11 , 12)

JUDGMENT :

1. Heard Sri Daya Shankar Mishra, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Sri Chandrakesh Mishra and Sri Abhishek Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner in CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 16946 of 2024 and in APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 40591 of 2024; Sri Upendra Upadhyay, learned counsel for the petitioner in CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION NO. - 17602 OF 2024; Sri Prabha Shanker Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner in CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION NO. - 18422 OF 2024 and Sri Manish Goyal, learned Additional Advocate General assisted by Sri J.K. Upadhyay and Sri Rupak Chaube, learned counsel for the State.

2. The petitioner has challenged the First Information Report dated 31.8.2024, under Section 2/3 of U.P. Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 (hereinafter referred to as the “Gangster Act, 1986”) which had given rise to Case Crime No. 0556 of 2024, Police Station – Karvi Kotwali Nagar, District - Chitrakoot.

3. Sri Daya Shankar Mishra, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Sri Chandrakesh Mishra and Sri Abhishek Kumar Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner has argued that the first information report which was lodged under Section 2/3 of the Gangster Act, 1986 is dependent on the rules of Uttar Pradesh Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Rules, 2021 (hereinafter referred to as the “Gangster Rules, 2021”). He has submitted that as per the rules, there has to be, before the lodging of the first information report, a preparation of the gang chart which is as per Rules 5(1) of the Gangster Rules, 2021. The In-charge of police station has to prepare a gang chart wherein are mentioned the criminal details of a particular gang. The gang chart thereafter is presented as per Rule 5(2) of the Gangster Rules, 2021 to the District Head of Police after a clear recommendation of the Additional Superintendent of Police mentioning therein the detailed activities in relation to all the persons of the said gang. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submitted that as per Rule 5(3)(a) of the Gangster Rules, 2021 before a gang chart is prepared it has to be approved, but not summarily. It is approved only after a “due discussion” is done in a joint meeting of the Commissioner of Police, District Magistrate, Senior Superintendent of Police and Superintended of Police. The other provisions with regard to how the gang chart has to be prepared are contained in Rules 5(3)(b), 5(3)(c), 5(3)(d) and 5(3)(e) of the Gangster Rules, 2021.

4. Since learned counsel for the petitioner heavily relied upon Rule 5 of the Gangster Rules, 2021, the same is being reproduced here as under:-

5. General Rules.-(1) To initiate proceedings under this Act, the concerned Incharge of Police Station/Station House Officer/Inspector shall prepare a gang-chart mentioning the details of criminal activities of the gang.

(2) The gang-chart will be presented to the district head of police after clear recommendation of the Additional Superintendent of Police mentioning the detailed activities in relation to all the persons of the said gang.

(3) The following provisions shall be complied with in respect of gang-charts:

(a) The gang-chart will not be approved summarily but after due discussion in a joint meeting of the Commissioner of Police/District Magistrate/Senior Superintendent of Police/Superintendent of Police.

(b) There may be no gang of one person but there may be a gang of known and other unknown persons and in that form the gang-chart may be approved as per these rules.

(c) The gang-chart shall not mention those cases in which acquittal has been granted by the Special Court or in which the final report has been

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top