VIVEK KUMAR BIRLA, VINOD DIWAKAR
Narender Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Heard Shri Satish Tamta, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Shri Mohd. Khalid, learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri G.P. Singh, learned A.G.A. for the State-respondents, and perused the record.
2. The present writ petition has been preferred with the prayer to quash the impugned First Information Report dated 20.3.2023 registered as Case Crime No. 136 of 2023, under Sections 2, 3(1) of the U.P. Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, Police Station-Dadri, District-Gautam Budh Nagar, and for a direction to the police not to arrest the petitioner in pursuance of the impugned FIR.
3. The prosecution's case posits that the petitioner, in collaboration with other gang members, usurped the Patta land allotted to landless individuals from scheduled castes and scheduled tribes in accordance with Government land allotment policies. This acquisition was allegedly executed through the use of coercion and intimidation, allowing the petitioner and their associates to purchase the land at reduced rates and subsequently vend the same at elevated prices in an orchestrated manner. These gang members, acting both collectively and individually engaged in activities ai
Motiram Ghelabhai (deceased L.R.) v. Jagan Nagar (deceased L.Rs.) and others
Sundaram Pillai v. Pattabiraman
Nelson Motis v. Union of India
Kanailal Sur v. Paramnidhi Sadhu Khan
State of Uttar Pradesh v. Vijay Anand Maharaj
Gwalior Rayon Silk Mfg. (Wvg.) Co. Ltd. v. Custodian of Vested Forests
Shah Bhojraj Kuverji Oil Mills and Ginning Factory v. Subhash Chandra Yograj Sinha
The court affirmed that compliance with the U.P. Gangsters Act's procedural requirements, particularly regarding gang-chart approval, hinges on the completion of the underlying investigation.
The court affirmed that the U.P. Gangsters Act allows for prosecution based on a single case, provided the investigation is complete before approving the gang chart.
The U.P. Gangster Act can be invoked based on a solitary case, provided the preparation and approval of the gang chart comply with statutory requirements.
The judgment establishes that procedural compliance in gang chart preparation is crucial to uphold the integrity of the Gangster Act and protect individual rights.
The court ruled that procedural violations in preparing the gang-chart rendered the F.I.R. unsustainable, and that mentioning Section 3 suffices for F.I.R. registration without detailing offences und....
The duty of competent authorities to exercise independent mind and follow prescribed procedures in preparing and approving gang-charts under the Gangster Act, 1986.
Incomplete and defective gang chart - It is true that there shall not be repetition of case crime numbers as it may attract the vice of double jeopardy, but there is no restriction if any “addenda” i....
The invocation of the Gangsters Act requires substantial evidence and strict adherence to procedural compliance to prevent misuse and ensure justice.
(1) Anti-Social Activities – Continuation of criminal proceedings against appellant would result in undue harassment when there is no material against him and will result in abuse of process of law.(....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.