SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(All) 3550

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
SARAL SRIVASTAVA, AMITABH KUMAR RAI, JJ.
M/s Maha Shakti Traders and Another – Appellants
Versus
State of U.P. and Others – Respondents
Writ (C) No. 10032 of 2022
Decided On : 17-11-2025

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Saumya Mandhyan
For the Respondent: Manoj Kumar Mishra

The court held that cancellation of a tender cannot disrupt the obligation to pay for work completed, establishing principles of equity and promissory estoppel in administrative actions.

Headnote:(A) Indian Constitution - Article 14 - Writ of Certiorari and Mandamus - Writ petitioner sought to quash a cancellation order and direct payment for completed work under awarded tenders - Court addressed arbitrary denial of payment despite substantial completion of work and contrasted treatment with other contractors - Court held that principles of promissory estoppel applied due to reliance on official conduct - Orders invalidated due to lack of rational ground. (Paras 18, 19, 20)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner submitted bids for sewer construction and supply of clamps, which were accepted. The petitioner completed 85-90% of the work, but the tender was canceled before payment was made. Issues arose regarding arbitrary payment denial when other contractors were paid for similar work.

Findings of Court:
The Court noted substantial completion of work and arbitrary payment practices by officials, leading to a directive for payment to the petitioner.

Issues: Whether cancellation of tender justified non-payment after substantial work completion and if discrimination in payments violated constitutional rights.

Ratio Decidendi: The Court concluded that cancellation of the tender did not negate the obligation to pay for work done, reaffirming principles of equity and fairness under Article 14 of the Constitution.

Result: Writ petition allowed; payment ordered to the petitioner within specified time.

Table of Content
1. background facts related to the tender process (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12)
2. arguments regarding payment entitlement due to work completed (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16)
3. court's reasoning on the denial of payment and arbitrariness (Para 17 , 18 , 19 , 20)
4. final decision to allow the writ petition for payment (Para 21)

JUDGMENT :

AMITABH KUMAR RAI, J.

1. Heard Ms. Saumya Mandhyan, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri Krishna Dutt Mishra, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State-respondents.

2. The instant writ petition has been preferred seeking the following reliefs:-

"(i) to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the order and judgment dated 20.01.2016 passed by the Respondent No. 2 so far as it concerns the Petitioner No. 1, being arbitrary, whimsical and bad in law;

(ii) to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to release the amount of Rs. 59,62,135/- for the tender work of Sewer Construction (Nala Nirman) from Soron Gate Police Chowki to Allahnoor Saifi's Shop to the petitioners;

(iii) to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to release the amount of Rs. 2,22,000/- for the tender work of supply of clamps with nut bolt to the petitioners;"

3. The brief facts of the case are that tenders were invited by the Nagar Palika Parishad, Kasganj for 41 categories of works vide tender notification dated 4.8.2015. The petitioner’s firm in furtherance of the tender notification submitted bid for two tenders, one for construction of sewerage from Soron Gate Police Chowki to Allahnoor Saifi's Shop with bid amount of Rs.59,62,135/-. The bid of the petitioner’s firm was lowest, hence tender committee recommended for award of tender to the petitioner’s firm on 19.8.2015 which was accepted and the work order was issued. The petitioner’s firm also submitted bid for supply of clamps with nut bolts which was also accepted in favour of the petitioner’s firm. As per the tender invitation notice dated 4.8.2015, the work of sewerage construction was to be completed within two months and the supply of clamp was to be made within 15 days of the award of the tender. The supply order was issued by the Executive Officer, Nagar Palika Parishad, Kashganj for supply of the clamp along with nut bolts which is annexed at Page No. 47 of the writ petition and furtherance thereof petitioner’s firm supplied the quantity of clamps with nut bolts which was duly acknowledged and the receipt of such acknowledgment are collectively annexed as Annexure No.8 to the writ petition.

4. The acknowledgment indicates that the supply of the clamp along with nut bolts were made between the period 3.11.2015 to 24.11.2015. In the meantime, it seems that some complaint was made by one of the contractor which was inquired upon by the Additional District Magistrate, Kasganj who submitted its report dated 29.12.2015 and on the basis of the said inquiry report, order dated 20.1.2016 was passed by the District Magistrate, Kasganj cancelling the tender invitation notice dated 4.8.2015. In the meantime, the petitioner’s firm has already supplied the clamp along with nut bolts in reference to the tender invitation notice dated 4.8.2015 amounting to Rs.2,22,000/- and has also completed the construction of the sewerage up to 85 to 90 per cent.

5. It seems that thereafter a fresh tender notice was issued inviting tender with respect to the works which were also part of the notice inviting tender dated 4.8.2015, out of which many works already stood completed, hence a complaint was made and the Additional District Magistrate, Kasganj. In charge (Local Bodies) instituted inquiry vide letter dated 10.3.2016 by a team comprising of Tehsildar (Judicial), Kasganj, Executive Officer P.W.D., Kasganj, Executive Officer, Rural Engineering Department, Kasganj. The committee submitted its report on the basis of which the Additi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top