SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(All) 3587

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
VIVEK KUMAR SINGH
Wasiullah – Appellant
Versus
State Of U.P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Applicant : Vikas Yadav
For the Opposite Party : G.A.

JUDGMENT :

VIVEK KUMAR SINGH, J.

1. Heard Shri Vikas Yadav, learned counsel for the applicants, Shri Ranu, learned counsel appearing for the opposite party no.2 as well as the learned AGA for the State of U.P.

2. Present application under Section 528 BNSS has been preferred by the applicants seeking quashing of the entire proceedings of Sessions Trial No.187 of 2017 (State vs. Wasiullah and Others), arising out of Case Crime No.64 of 2017, under sections 363, 366, 504, 506 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short 'IPC)' and Section 7/8 of The Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (in short 'POCSO Act') against the applicant no.1 and under Sections 504 and 506 IPC against the applicant nos.2 & 3, Police Station Bakhira, District Sant Kabir Nagar as well as impugned Chargesheet dated 16.03.2017 and Cognizance/Summoning order dated 23.03.2017, pending in the court of learned Special Court, POCSO Act, District-Sant Kabir Nagar.

3. The brief facts of the case are that the opposite party no.2/first informant lodged a first information report against the applicants on 19.01.2017 in respect of the alleged incident dated 30.12.2016. The first information report was registered as

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top