SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(All) 38

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
SAMIT GOPAL, J.
Alice Lee @ Li Tengli – Appellant
Versus
Union of India and Another – Respondents
Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 41710 of 2025
Decided On : 09-02-2026

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Jitendra Kumar Srivastava
For the Respondents: Dhananjay Awasthi, Krishna Agarawal

The Court allowed bail to a foreign national accused of GST evasion, emphasizing family ties and lengthy trial as crucial factors without deeming detention illegal.

Headnote:(A) Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 - Sections 132 - Bail application under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. for a Chinese national accused of GST evasion - Detention is not deemed illegal in violation of Article 21 - The maximum sentence is five years, and trial is pending - Considerations for allowing bail include applicant being a lady with young child and the nature of the evidence. (Paras 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 18, 19, 20, 21)

(B) While opposing bail, Prosecutor cites prior arrests and economic nature of the charges, emphasizing a different approach for economic offences. (Paras 12, 13)

Facts of the case:
The applicant has been in custody since 26.08.2025 and is charged with assisting evasion of GST over multiple financial years, contested due to her visa status and unfair prosecution claims as a foreign national. The company involved faces serious claims of tax evasion totaling over eleven crore, but this is contested by the applicant's representation of evidence suggesting her limited role as a security staff member.

Findings of Court:
Considering the circumstances, including the trial's potential delay and the applicant's family situation, she is declared eligible for bail with specific conditions to ensure her return to court.

Issues: The court addressed questions about the legality of her custody, the implications of her visa status, and the ramifications of her charge.

Ratio Decidendi: The court determined that despite serious charges, the applicant's family ties and the trial's foreseeable length justified a favorable bail decision, reflecting evolving interpretations of detained foreign nationals' rights in the context of procedural justice.

Result: Bail application allowed.

JUDGMENT :

SAMIT GOPAL, J.

1. List revised.

2. Heard Sri Jitendra Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Krishna Agarawal, learned counsel for the opposite party no.1/Union of India and Sri Dhananjay Awasthi, learned counsel for the opposite party no.2/CGST and perused the material on record.

3. This bail application under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. has been filed by the applicant Alice Lee @ Li Tengli, seeking enlargement on bail during trial in connection with Case No. 40 of 2025, under Sections 132(1)(d), 132(1)(e), 132(1)(f), 132(1)(l), 132(1)(i) of the CGST, Act, 2017, registered at Police Station CGST Commissionerate, District Gautam Budh Nagar.

4. On 13.01.2026 the following order was passed by this Court:

"1. List revised.

2. Heard Sri Jitendra Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Dhananjay Awasthi, learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2/Central Goods & Services Tax Commissionerate, Gautam Buddha Nagar (Anti Evasion), Sri Shikhar Khare, Advocate, holding brief of Sri Krishna Agarawal, learned counsel for the opposite party no. 1/Union of India and perused the record.

3. Admittedly the applicant is a Chinese national. She is in jail since 26.8.2025. This is an application for bail under Section 483 B.N.S.S., 2023. The question as would arise in the matter is as to whether the applicant still holds a valid Visa or not as in case of her release, the question of her stay in the country without a valid Visa would be a matter to be considered.

4. Learned counsel for the applicant is unable to disclose regarding status of Visa of the applicant for which he prays for a week's time to inform the Court about it. Prayer is allowed.

5 . List on 21.01.2026 as fresh."

5. Subsequently learned counsel for the Union of India further sought time for compliance of the said order on 30.01.2026 and the following order was passed:

"1. List revised.

2. Heard Sri Jitendra Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Dhananjay Awasthi, learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2, Sri Krishna Agarawal, learned counsel for the opposite party no. 1 and perused the record.

3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that he shall be filing his supplementary affidavit in the office within four days. If any such affidavit is filed, office to trace it out and place it on the record by the next date.

4. In response to the observation(s) of the Court in the order dated 13.01.2026, learned counsel for Union of India/Opposite Party No. 1 prays for one week time to seek full and complete instructions with regard to the same. Prayer is allowed.

5. List on 09.02.2026 as fresh."

6. Today he is provided the Court with a document running in 9 pages titled as "Status Report" in the present matter and while placing para 8-10 has submitted that such an accused can apply for a temporary visa and the application shall be decided as per procedure and necessary enquiry and approvals. The said para reads as under:

"8. That as per Paragraph 5 of the Immigration and Foreigners Order 2025, leave shall be refused (to a foreign national) if the civil authority (FRRO) is satisfied that the foreigner's presence is required in India to answer a criminal charge. That under such circumstances, an appropriate category of Entry Visa (X-Misc category) is granted to an accused foreign national who is facing criminal charge/trial proceedings, in order to facilitate the foreign national to face criminal charge/trial proceedings before the concerned Ld. Trial Court or to appear before the Investigating agency if the criminal case/proceedings is pending investigation. Further, said Entry Visa (X-Misc) can be extended six months at a time. The foreign national while applying/registering for such a visa gets entered into the system of the immigration department and it becomes easy to track the movements of such a foreign national. It is pertinent to mention here that this visa is granted to such foreign national only for the sole purpose of facing cri

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top