Back
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
ARINDAM SINHA, SATYA VEER SINGH
Sunil Kandu @ Sunil Kumar Gupta – Appellant
Versus
Secretary, Ministry Of Home Affairs – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's requests for compensation and investigation. (Para 1) |
| 2. chronology and details of the case against the petitioner. (Para 2 , 3 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 10 , 12) |
| 3. analysis of procedural failures and human rights implications of arrest. (Para 4 , 5 , 9 , 11 , 15 , 16 , 18) |
| 4. compensation can be granted for wrongful arrest under certain conditions. (Para 14 , 19) |
| 5. court ordered compensation to petitioner. (Para 20) |
JUDGMENT :
Arindam Sinha, J.
1. Petitioner appears in person. Prayers made by him in the petition are reproduced below.
"(I) Hon'ble Justices are requested to kindly pass an order in accordance with the Constitution under Section 18(A-1) of the Human Rights Act, 1993, in the interest of justice, to provide compensation to the family of the petitioner from opponents No. 1 and 2.
(II) Hon'ble Justices are requested to pass a just order for the judicial investigation of the above matter by the Law Officer of the Human Rights Commission, who has worked as a senior judges in the District Court and is currently working in the Human Rights Commission, on the complaint application dated 03.03.2023 submitted by the petitioner under Section 13(1) of the Human Rights
The court held that without credible evidence, an arrest constitutes a violation of Article 21, and compensation may be awarded for wrongful detention.
The judgment establishes the importance of upholding the rights guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution of India and the need for a reasonable basis for arrest under the Cr.P.C.
The judgment establishes that police must justify arrests and follow legal procedures, particularly in non-bailable offenses, to protect individual liberties.
The case reinforces the necessity of informing arrestees of the grounds for their arrest and complying with preventive detention laws, establishing that unlawful arrests lead to compensation for viol....
Compensation for violations of Article 21 is a public law remedy, essential for enforcing accountability and deterring state misconduct, distinct from private law remedies.
The court established that police officers must comply with statutory requirements before arresting another officer, and failure to do so constitutes a violation of fundamental rights under Article 2....
Arrest and detention – No arrest can be made in a routine manner on a mere allegation of commission of an offence made against a person – It would be prudent and wise for a Police officer that no arr....
Police must justify arrests under Section 41 CrPC, ensuring compliance with legal standards to protect individual rights.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
