Back
M. NAGAPRASANNA
Kuldeep, S/o. Chandrashekhar Shetty – Appellant
Versus
State Of Karnataka, Ministry Of Home Affairs, Ambedkar Veedhi Bengaluru – 560 001 By Secretary – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. dispute over access to agricultural property. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 9 , 10) |
| 2. petitioner's rights violated due to illegal arrest. (Para 6) |
| 3. police actions justified in exceptional circumstances. (Para 7) |
| 4. apex court precedents on illegal arrest. (Para 12 , 14) |
| 5. power of arrest must be justified according to law. (Para 15) |
| 6. compensation for violation of personal liberty. (Para 19) |
| 7. state mandated to pay compensation and initiate inquiry. (Para 20) |
ORDER :
1. The petitioner, a young advocate laments that his personal liberty is torn into smithereens by a few, megalomaniac and mayhem happy, police personnel in an act of outrage of his human rights.
2. The facts adumbrated are as follows:
The petitioner, a young boy of 23 years, an Advocate, too young to the bar, having enrolled on 02-11-2022 to the Karnataka State Bar Council claims to be practicing in all Courts of the city at Mangaluru. The narration of the story is that, the petitioner owns certain agricultural property, it abuts an agricultural property of Mrs. Bhavani and K.Vasantha
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
