SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(All) 219

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
AJIT KUMAR, SWARUPAMA CHATURVEDI
Wizitec Private Limited – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttar Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Narendra Singh

JUDGMENT :

SWARUPAMA CHATURVEDI, J.

1. Heard Sri Ashwini Kumar Yadav, learned advocate holding brief of Sri Narendra Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Mukul Tripathi, learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents.

2. By means of present writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, petitioner seeks issuance of appropriate writs, orders or directions, including a writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing the impugned indefinite blacklisting order bearing Letter No. SSA/J.S.P./12226-34/2025-26 dated 26.11.2025 as well as the letter bearing No. SSA/District Resource Training/9852-60/2025-26 dated 29.09.2025, issued by Respondent No. 4, as the letter expands the scope of work of the petitioner and runs contrary to the Government Order dated 26.07.2024, and further seeks issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents, jointly and severally, to forthwith reinstate and restore the contract awarded to the petitioner for supply of 168 ECCE Educators and 40 Technical Instructors in District Shahjahanpur under Bid No.GEM/2025B5794364, to remove the petitioner’s name from the blacklist maintained on the GeM portal and from al

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top