Back
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW
SHEKHAR B.SARAF, ABDHESH KUMAR CHAUDHARY
Vertel Digital Pvt. Ltd. Thru. Authorized Director Shri Ramneek Chopra – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. of Home U.P. Lko. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Objections to the application for vacation of interim order and objections to the application filed on behalf of intervenor- M/S Mobile Communications (India) Pvt. Ltd. are taken on record.
(Order on Intervention/Impleadment Application (IA) No.2 of 2026.
2. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties.
3. The present application seeking impleadment/intervention has been filed by the applicant/respondent-M/S Mobile Communications (India) Pvt. Ltd., who were declared as the successful L-1 bidder on 30.01.2026.
4. We have perused the affidavit accompanying the intervention/impleadment application and find that sufficient cause has been made out for allowing the same.
5. Since, any order passed by this Court would have an impact on the rights that may have accrued in favour of the applicant, this Court deems the applicant to be a necessary party to this lis.
6. Accordingly, application for intervention/impleadment is allowed.
( Order on Writ Petition)
1. Heard Shri Jaideep Narain Mathur, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Shri Anupras Singh, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, Shri Shailendra Kumar Singh, learned Chief Standing Counsel assisted by Shri Pan
A suspension order under inquiry does not equate to blacklisting; judicial review in tender matters is limited to ensuring no arbitrary actions against public interest.
The rejection of the petitioners' bid was justified based on their debarment for supplying substandard quality drugs, in line with the State's policy to keep such manufacturers out of the tender proc....
The court emphasized the limited scope of judicial review in tender matters, the importance of punctilious and rigid enforcement of tender terms, and the uniform application of tender requirements to....
The court affirmed that a bidder's disqualification due to false declarations in tender processes is valid, emphasizing limited judicial review in contractual matters.
Judicial review in tender matters is limited to assessing arbitrariness, irrationality, or mala fides; decisions should reflect fair competition and not accommodate late submissions of corrected bids....
Judicial review of tendering decisions is limited to assessing legality, with courts refraining from substituting the tender authority's decisions unless in cases of illegality or manifest arbitrarin....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
