Back
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW
SHEKHAR B.SARAF, ABDHESH KUMAR CHAUDHARY
Vertel Digital Pvt. Ltd. Thru. Authorized Director Shri Ramneek Chopra – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. of Home U.P. Lko. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. intervention application by bidder accepted. (Para 1 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. petitioners challenge state's decisions. (Para 2 , 6) |
| 3. suspension not equated to blacklisting. (Para 7 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 4. clarification from supreme court on non-blacklisting. (Para 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 5. judicial review in tender matters is limited. (Para 16 , 18 , 19) |
| 6. importance of expertise in tender evaluations. (Para 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 7. petitioner's delay criticized. (Para 24) |
| 8. writ petition disposed without costs. (Para 25 , 27 , 28) |
JUDGMENT :
1. Objections to the application for vacation of interim order and objections to the application filed on behalf of intervenor- M/S Mobile Communications (India) Pvt. Ltd. are taken on record.
(Order on Intervention/Impleadment Application (IA) No.2 of 2026.
2. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties.
3. The present application seeking impleadment/intervention has been filed by the applicant/respondent-M/S Mobile Communications (India) Pvt. Ltd., who were declared as the successful L-1 bidder on 30.01.2026.
4. We have perused the affidavit accompanying the intervention/impleadment application and find that sufficient cause has been made out for al
A suspension order under inquiry does not equate to blacklisting; judicial review in tender matters is limited to ensuring no arbitrary actions against public interest.
The rejection of the petitioners' bid was justified based on their debarment for supplying substandard quality drugs, in line with the State's policy to keep such manufacturers out of the tender proc....
Judicial review in tenders limited to mala fides, arbitrariness, irrationality impacting public interest; courts defer to authority's interpretation of eligibility unless perverse.
The court emphasized the limited scope of judicial review in tender matters, the importance of punctilious and rigid enforcement of tender terms, and the uniform application of tender requirements to....
The court affirmed that a bidder's disqualification due to false declarations in tender processes is valid, emphasizing limited judicial review in contractual matters.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
