IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
SANDEEP JAIN
Mohd Mubin – Appellant
Versus
Ateeq Ahmad Kaif – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of property dispute. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 2. defendants deny execution of wills. (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 19 , 20) |
| 3. court's analysis on the proving of wills. (Para 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48) |
| 4. legal principles governing wills under muslim law. (Para 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64) |
| 5. court's conclusion on the validity of the wills. (Para 66 , 67 , 68 , 69 , 70) |
| 6. final ruling and dismissal of appeal. (Para 86 , 89 , 92 , 93) |
JUDGMENT :
SANDEEP JAIN, J.
1. The instant appeal has been filed under Section 96 C.P.C. against the impugned judgment and decree dated 20.01.2026, passed by the Court of Civil Judge (Senior Division), Kasganj, in Original Suit No. 174 of 2016 ( Mohd. Mubin and another vs. Ateeq Ahmad Kaif and others ), whereby the plaintiffs’ suit seeking cancellation of the registered sale deed dated 24.10.2016, executed by the defendants of the second set in favour of the defendants of the first set, and also seeking the relief of permanent injunction restraining the defendants from interfering with their peaceful possession of the disputed property, has been rejected.
Plaint Case
2. The factual matrix is that the plai

Shivakumar and others vs. Sharanabasappa and others
Ratnagiri Nagar Parishad vs. Gangaram Narayan Ambekar and Ors.
A Muslim cannot bequeath property exceeding one-third without consent from all heirs, rendering such wills invalid if contested; ownership must not exclude necessary parties.
Mohammedan Law – Will – No formality or a particular form is required in law for the purpose of creating a valid will – An unequivocal expression by testator serves the purpose.
Mahomedan law restricts testamentary bequests to one-third of the estate without consent from other heirs, a principle courts erred in evaluating, leading to misjudgment of the plaintiff's rights.
A Will must meet statutory requirements for validity; failure to prove due execution amidst suspicious circumstances leads to the original party's entitlement to inheritance.
The execution of a Will must be proven beyond reasonable doubt, especially when suspicious circumstances exist, and mere compliance with legal formalities is insufficient.
The validity of a will is undermined when it is executed under suspicious circumstances, necessitating the propounder to dispel these doubts for the document to be accepted legally.
Preliminary decree for partition – Modified – A gift (Hiba) is the conferring of a right of property in something specific without an exchange (ewaz).
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.